|
Post by mape on Jan 21, 2005 23:27:53 GMT -5
Ian Brown has lashed out against his former Stone Roses band mate John Squire.
In an interview with 6 Music Brown described Squire as jealous and bitter.
Brown believes Squire recently branded him a "tuneless knob" and a "paranoid mess" because he's bitter his music career failed following the band's split, while Brown remains a revered solo artist.
The Stone Roses spent much of the early 90s embroiled in legal battles after signing with Geffen records, and split two years after the release of their long awaited Second Coming album in 1994, when Squire announced he wanted to pursue new projects.
"For me, right, he split up the best band in the country at the time, the Roses, and he went on to do what? Nothing. Nothing to write home about, so he must be a bit bitter because he's got to watch me steaming forward.
"There's no stopping it, I announce shows and they're gone in a day. It must be killing the kid. They say he was the best guitarist of his generation, which I think he is. Was. I hear his music now and what's happened to his guitar playing?
"All I Know is that when he was stood next to me he had pure success. Since he's been apart he's had nothing.
Brown has confirmed he will be performing at a number of summer festivals including Ireland’s Oxygen Festival and T In The Park he has also hinted he may be performing at this years Glastonbury festival.
Also lined up is a ‘Best Of…’ album, scheduled for release this summer.
He said: "It was '98 that I put 'My Star' out, so it's like seven years later. I think it would be a good time to do a Greatest Hits. I've done four albums, I've done a few collaborations with U.N.K.L.E., I could do a great 20-track Greatest Hits album. I think it would be stronger than the Roses' Greatest Hits.”<br> Brown has recently taken to playing some Stone Roses classics at his gigs, last year he played an entire set of Roses tunes, and there is every chance that he will continue to pepper his sets with some golden oldies.
Brown confided about why he had started playing his old bands songs: "Do you know how that came about? Someone sent me a CD of a John Squire solo gig and he was playing a few Roses tunes. Man, it was poor. I didn't think he had the right to do that to the tunes, you know, cos he was singing them as well. I don't think you can step to the mic aged 40 and cut it.
"I didn't think it was right, cos out of respect to the three other lads I'd never played any Roses tunes. I wanted to stand on my own two feet, so I kept away from the Roses and I just did my own thing, but when I heard that CD I thought 'that's out of order'.
"I thought 'if he ain't got the respect then I'm not gonna have none no more so I'm gonna play 'em meself now."
|
|
|
Post by LDD- Angelic Child on Jan 22, 2005 7:00:50 GMT -5
I'll support him on a lot of the things he said but i don't think his Greatest Hits will be better than the Roses.
I have 2 John Squire Albums (Time Changes Everything and Marshall's House). and only Solarised by Ian Brown... I like Solarised but John Squire's solo stuff is equally as good. The way Squire has written the music on his latest album (Marshall's House) is fookin' amazing. And Love is the Law by the Seahorses has to be one of my favourite Guitar intros ever.
I'll admit that John Squire hasn't had the populatity he wanted after the Roses but i also think that the Roses fell apart without him.
...meh... i think they're both great.
|
|
|
Post by daysleeper on Jan 22, 2005 7:40:01 GMT -5
What kind of music is Squire doing now? Marshalls house - is it any good? I have Time Changes Everything and its decent enough but i was disappointed he'd gone for a more acoustic laid back route i think he's at his best when he's blasting out the riffs - Love is the Law and Blinded by the Sun are top quality songs. But there is no question that Brown is far more popular now than Squire. Its a shame to seem them bickering
|
|
|
Post by J.Velvert on Jan 24, 2005 3:03:35 GMT -5
What kind of music is Squire doing now? Marshalls house - is it any good? 3 minute pop-songs, no big guitars.. but closer to the 60's influences of the Roses than Time Changes Everything. I think it's worth a listen, but if you don't like his singing, then the songs won't propably stand out. Ian & John, both legends.
|
|
|
Post by Columbia on Jan 24, 2005 11:51:16 GMT -5
i was disapointed that squire lashed back at brown. I thought squire was doing really well to keep his dignity in the hole thing before i read that. I love there music, the roses are my fav band ever but there both acting like dick heads now.
|
|