|
Post by Parka Flames on Jul 26, 2018 3:52:08 GMT -5
What do you think will be Noel Gallagher's legacy?
Someone here recently said that Noel has always worked hard to create a body of work that will stand the test of time. While he's never been much for musical experimentation, he seems to take songwriting very seriously and clearly wishes to be remembered as one of the greats.
Noel's immediate impact on the music industry is apparent to anyone who lived in Britain in the late 90s and early 00s. Right after Knebworth you see an explosion of artists and groups doing Morning Glory-esque rock; Robbie Williams, The Verve, Travis, Stereophonics, etc. Then in the mid 00s bands like Kasabian, Arctic Monkeys, The Killers and The Enemy all cited Noel as an influence on their sound.
Now, thanks to the continuing solo efforts of both Gallaghers, Noel's music is once again in the charts and adored by a new generation of fans. Of course it remains to be seen if another wave of bands like the above will come out of Britain trumpeting Noel as their inspiration. But do you think in the future Noel will be held up with the likes of Lennon, McCartney, Weller, Davies, etc? Or will Oasis fade into obscurity?
|
|
|
Post by Mean Mrs. Mustard on Jul 26, 2018 4:00:39 GMT -5
Lennon and McCartney are in a league of their own IMO. Ray is great, but the Kinks are a very underrated band. Great songwriter though.
Weller? Huge distance between the above 3 and Weller. Might want to put Noel in the same league as him though. He wrote some downright classics known by everyone and was a big influence on the bands you mentioned.
|
|
|
Post by morning_rain on Jul 26, 2018 4:16:49 GMT -5
I don't think he's on the same level as Lennon/McCartney or Bowie.
But definitely on the same league as Weller, Robert Smith or Morrissey/Marr. And although it's a bit early I think Turner will end up on that league too.
|
|
|
Post by bt95 on Jul 26, 2018 4:35:33 GMT -5
He's the best songwriter of his generation.
Lennon, McCartney, Bowie - league of their own, obviously.
But at the end of the day, nobody has come close in the last 20 years to doing what Oasis did. And as much as it was the attitude and the fashion that has had a lasting impact, it's the songs - and Noel knew it from the start.
An egotistical little scrounge from Manchester, but he knew what he'd got and knew where to take it.
|
|
|
Post by bt95 on Jul 26, 2018 4:41:20 GMT -5
Worth noting that at Tramlines my mate who has not seen either Gallagher came.
He hasn't really listened to Noel's new album fully, but he's got a good taste in music and good knowledge. He prefers Liam's but was looking forward to seeing Noel live.
It blew him away.
Maybe it was the crowd, maybe it was the fact that Noel was so up for it and it's not the plodding, dad-rock Noel of a few years ago.
My mate - after a Beautiful World had finished - just said 'he's rock and roll, proper rock and roll'.
And yeh, for the first time probably this tour I realised what Noel meant about WBTM being his most rock n roll album in a long time. Because rock n roll isn't about the fur jackets or the shades or the drugs. It's about the spirit of doing whatever you want and having the conviction to follow it through, and then pulling it off. And both Liam and Noel have done that, both to varying degrees of success throughout their respective careers. But at the moment, I think they're both at the top of their game and we live in a great time to be Oasis fans, reward for sticking by them in the period preceding and following their break up when tbf they'd become a parody of themselves.
|
|
|
Post by freddy838 on Jul 26, 2018 5:42:20 GMT -5
Noel, Liam and Oasis will go down among the all time greats. I think the recent solo successes and love from a new generation have proven that.
|
|
|
Post by oasisglory on Jul 26, 2018 6:44:32 GMT -5
Of course it remains to be seen if another wave of bands like the above will come out of Britain trumpeting Noel as their inspiration. But do you think in the future Noel will be held up with the likes of Lennon, McCartney, Weller, Davies, etc? Or will Oasis fade into obscurity? It's a very interesting question. It's fantastic to see both Gallaghers in the higher echelons of the charts, continuing to sell out gigs and produce great material. I think that both genuinely enjoy making music and the creative process which makes it even more accessible to us all (including the new generation of fans), aside both their characters and personalities. I think back to Liam's interviews in Hampstead Heath or in a pub in Highgate as examples - the biggest rock 'n' roll star of his generation who you could easily bump into in the street or down the pub, yet in today's world is a stark difference to the heavily guarded, somewhat reclusive manufactured 'stars'. Ultimately, as bt95 eluded to, we are the biggest winners here, as we get double the albums, double the gigs and double the experiences to enjoy. As to Noel's legacy, I think the 2 big markers one can immediately cite are Stop the Clocks and Supersonic (the film). In Stop The Clocks, there is a compilation that showcases much of Noel's artistry: every track on the album is a massive, popular classic that many a non-follower would instantly recognise, and that's notwithstanding that over half of Oasis' discography is not included. There have of course been other big and good bands and songs since Oasis for example of Coldplay and the Arctic Monkeys. But it is difficult to imagine a more powerful modern day body of life-affirming work than Noel’s, and for me that puts him much closer to the likes of Paul McCartney and John Lennon, Ray Davies, Johnny Marr, Freddie Mercury and Paul Weller – it’s that ability to unite people through music and create a commonality, no matter what the lyrics might be, whether that’s solidarity via Don’t Look Back in Anger, uproar via Cigarettes and Alcohol or love via Wonderwall. Those same attributes are there through the post Oasis days too, with the likes of If I Had A Gun, Riverman, While The Song Remains the Same and Holy Mountain. At the same time, a latter day track like Dead In The Water strikes me for 2 reasons: one, that he can still write this kind of song in an environment where he is seemingly so content and happy with his family, wife and life in general is testament to that innate ability of his to quiet melancholy but defiance, a trait that runs through many of his songs like Half The World Away and Shout It Out Loud, and two, that he can so readily forget it, since he nearly didn’t put it on the album. The further enticing prospect for us fans is that Noel has said he has plenty of these kind of songs in stock; we can only hope they see the light of day. I think Supersonic served as the perfect fillip to the Noel, indeed Oasis, legacy. It came at the right time, just perhaps at the point where Oasis could have gone out of the public conscious and been replaced with the modern guises of Beady Eye and the High Flying Birds. What Supersonic did was unabashedly celebrate all that Oasis stood for and showed everyone just how they became the biggest band around. It was beautifully and uniquely crafted, and managed to draw in a whole new audience and give them that experience of what the last heroes of music were all about. As a side note, I love the bit where Mark Coyle speaks about Noel taking on a different persona when he is in a recording booth – that when he is in it, he reaches out to his emotional side – and yet when he’s back out, he’s calling you a twat – from 2min 25sec on here: From a personal perspective, his impact on me has been immense – he and Oasis inspired me to pick up and learn guitar, and instil a confidence that says not to give a fuck most of the time but which also says no-one has to hear you play or being the best in ability: just play (and write) for yourself. I’m sure I’m not the only one who feels the way I do. Will it inspire a plethora of new bands that cite Noel as a key reference? Personally I doubt it , not because of Noel or the music, it’s just that to me, that doesn’t seem the way things are done nowadays as we are bombarded in the main with anodyne, flavour of the day pop, which will sell/stream by the truckload, but will we be remembering these songs in even 2 or 5 years time? I’m not so sure. Overall, I think if one were to create a chronological timeline of great British songwriters, Noel’s name would rightfully sit alongside fellow greats.
|
|
|
Post by dampcottage on Jul 26, 2018 9:48:24 GMT -5
Anyone else remember an interview noel gave at some point in the mid 90s in which he basically named all the greatest artists from the birth of rock n roll to the present day, beginning with blues, through each decade, including elvis, beatles, stones,hendrix, bowie, t rex, sex pistols, the jam, smiths, stone roses (and many many more!) with oasis being the next band in a great lineage? Well it would be impossible to disagree with it, Its been nearly 50 years since the beatles split and people will still be listening and still discovering the music in another 50 years time, same goes for all the other bands mentioned in that interview, including oasis. And I fully believe that noels songwriting legacy will stand right at the top of the tree above even lennon, mccartney, bowie ect, think about it, how many absolutely fuckin fantastic songs has noel written? And hes not finished yet! There was (and still is) an element of the music press and general public that hate noel/liam/oasis for a variety of bullshit reasons, but the one thing that cant be denied is the songs, mark my words sometime in the next 5-10 years noel will hit another peak comparable with his output of the 90s and everything he touches will be absolute gold, he will have the sunday night headline slot at glastonbury and everyone will be saying how they always loved everything he ever did and blah blah blah...................personally I have always believed that noel is not among the greatest but he is THE greatest!
|
|
|
Post by mossy on Jul 26, 2018 9:56:53 GMT -5
Noel’s legacy will be this forum, where people will argue about Liam’s voice, complain about the cosmic pop of Who Built The Moon and slate Heathen Chemistry / Mike Bruce / David Sardy for all eternity.
X
|
|
|
Post by Lennon2217 on Jul 26, 2018 10:07:56 GMT -5
Noel’s legacy will be this forum, where people will argue about Liam’s voice, complain about the cosmic pop of Who Built The Moon and slate Heathen Chemistry / Mike Bruce / David Sardy for all eternity. X And franklomax, we HATE franklomax
|
|
|
Post by Lennon2217 on Jul 26, 2018 10:11:02 GMT -5
He's the best songwriter of his generation. Lennon, McCartney, Bowie - league of their own, obviously. But at the end of the day, nobody has come close in the last 20 years to doing what Oasis did. And as much as it was the attitude and the fashion that has had a lasting impact, it's the songs - and Noel knew it from the start. An egotistical little scrounge from Manchester, but he knew what he'd got and knew where to take it.
|
|
|
Post by Parka Flames on Jul 26, 2018 11:25:42 GMT -5
Mean Mrs. Mustard & morning_rain: Personally I would put Noel above Weller, though I'd agree he's not quite up there with the Beatles. The 94-98 output comes close though bt95 Your friend's comments are very interesting! I'd agree that Noel has found his own style of rock n roll rather than just trying to sound and act like Liam, which he did in the 90s imo. oasisglory Very insightful. New Oasis fans these days are lucky! What you said about Oasis' impact on your personality resonates with me greatly, it wasn't until I discovered this band I learned how to not give a fuck about what anyone says about you. dampcottage Interesting point about the media perception of Noel & Liam, obviously in time that will all fade away and the music will be what they are remembered for. That to me suggests that they will go down in history as some of the all time greats. mossy And rightly so. Lennon2217 Hmm... does Thom Yorke qualify? I mean I know he's prolific and Radiohead have some good tracks (not a huge fan personally) but they haven't really had a lot of hits have they?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2018 11:31:13 GMT -5
Mean Mrs. Mustard & morning_rain: Personally I would put Noel above Weller, though I'd agree he's not quite up there with the Beatles. The 94-98 output comes close though bt95 Your friend's comments are very interesting! I'd agree that Noel has found his own style of rock n roll rather than just trying to sound and act like Liam, which he did in the 90s imo. oasisglory Very insightful. New Oasis fans these days are lucky! What you said about Oasis' impact on your personality resonates with me greatly, it wasn't until I discovered this band I learned how to not give a fuck about what anyone says about you. dampcottage Interesting point about the media perception of Noel & Liam, obviously in time that will all fade away and the music will be what they are remembered for. That to me suggests that they will go down in history as some of the all time greats. mossy And rightly so. Lennon2217 Hmm... does Thom Yorke qualify? I mean I know he's prolific and Radiohead have some good tracks (not a huge fan personally) but they haven't really had a lot of hits have they? Radiohead have quite a few hits. Creep, High and Dry, Fake Plastic Trees, Karma Police, No Surprises, to name the bigger ones.
|
|
|
Post by Lennon2217 on Jul 26, 2018 13:27:34 GMT -5
Mean Mrs. Mustard & morning_rain: Personally I would put Noel above Weller, though I'd agree he's not quite up there with the Beatles. The 94-98 output comes close though bt95 Your friend's comments are very interesting! I'd agree that Noel has found his own style of rock n roll rather than just trying to sound and act like Liam, which he did in the 90s imo. oasisglory Very insightful. New Oasis fans these days are lucky! What you said about Oasis' impact on your personality resonates with me greatly, it wasn't until I discovered this band I learned how to not give a fuck about what anyone says about you. dampcottage Interesting point about the media perception of Noel & Liam, obviously in time that will all fade away and the music will be what they are remembered for. That to me suggests that they will go down in history as some of the all time greats. mossy And rightly so. Lennon2217 Hmm... does Thom Yorke qualify? I mean I know he's prolific and Radiohead have some good tracks (not a huge fan personally) but they haven't really had a lot of hits have they? Are we just judging this on the merits of "hit singles"? That is a little narrow minded. Radiohead have always been an album oriented band and consider their music artistic expression. Some people write music to drink and fuck to, which is also fine. Radiohead have 6 #1 UK Albums, 2 USA #1 albums, along with another 4 albums going Top 3 in America. Pretty damn good work if you ask me. All written by Thom. Its true Radiohead don't have any #1 singles. But they do have many many Top 10 singles (Creep, Street Spirit, Paranoid Android, Karma Police, No Surprises, Pyramid Song and There There). Plus who would ever deny the brilliance of other singles like Fake Plastic Trees, High & Dry, Just, My Iron Lung, etc. Oasis is known to have 2 masterpiece albums but nothing since 1995. Thats a long time ago. What followed was a series of lesser returns as the band marched on. Radiohead on the other hand have 4 masterpieces, 2 of them coming post 90s. They also continue to operate as a healthy, functional and peak band in the year 2018. They've done enough.
|
|
|
Post by bt95 on Jul 26, 2018 13:27:42 GMT -5
He's the best songwriter of his generation. Lennon, McCartney, Bowie - league of their own, obviously. But at the end of the day, nobody has come close in the last 20 years to doing what Oasis did. And as much as it was the attitude and the fashion that has had a lasting impact, it's the songs - and Noel knew it from the start. An egotistical little scrounge from Manchester, but he knew what he'd got and knew where to take it. They bore me
|
|
|
Post by bt95 on Jul 26, 2018 13:29:33 GMT -5
Mean Mrs. Mustard & morning_rain : Personally I would put Noel above Weller, though I'd agree he's not quite up there with the Beatles. The 94-98 output comes close though bt95 Your friend's comments are very interesting! I'd agree that Noel has found his own style of rock n roll rather than just trying to sound and act like Liam, which he did in the 90s imo. oasisglory Very insightful. New Oasis fans these days are lucky! What you said about Oasis' impact on your personality resonates with me greatly, it wasn't until I discovered this band I learned how to not give a fuck about what anyone says about you. dampcottage Interesting point about the media perception of Noel & Liam, obviously in time that will all fade away and the music will be what they are remembered for. That to me suggests that they will go down in history as some of the all time greats. mossy And rightly so. Lennon2217 Hmm... does Thom Yorke qualify? I mean I know he's prolific and Radiohead have some good tracks (not a huge fan personally) but they haven't really had a lot of hits have they? Are we just judging this on the merits of "hit singles"? That is a little narrow minded. Radiohead have always been an album oriented band and consider their music artistic expression. Some people write music to drink and fuck to, which is also fine. Radiohead have 6 #1 UK Albums, 2 USA #1 albums, along with another 4 albums going Top 3 in America. Pretty damn good work if you ask me. All written by Thom. Its true Radiohead don't have any #1 singles. But they do have many many Top 10 singles (Creep, Street Spirit, Paranoid Android, Karma Police, No Surprises, Pyramid Song and There There). Plus who would ever deny the brilliance of other singles like Fake Plastic Trees, High & Dry, Just, My Iron Lung, etc. Oasis is known to have 2 masterpiece albums but nothing since 1995. Thats a long time ago. What followed was a series of lesser returns as the band marched on. Radiohead on the other hand have 4 masterpieces, 2 of them coming post 90s. They also continue to operate as a healthy, functional and peak band in the year 2018. They've done enough. I'd say Radiohead are a bigger global band than Oasis eventually ended up. But, I think Oasis'/NG's songs will influence more people down the line. Maybe it's because, to me at least, Radiohead are all about 'complicating' music (that doesn't make it bad), but it's kind of difficult for me to relate to Thom Yorke. It just comes down to taste.
|
|
|
Post by Lennon2217 on Jul 26, 2018 13:36:53 GMT -5
Are we just judging this on the merits of "hit singles"? That is a little narrow minded. Radiohead have always been an album oriented band and consider their music artistic expression. Some people write music to drink and fuck to, which is also fine. Radiohead have 6 #1 UK Albums, 2 USA #1 albums, along with another 4 albums going Top 3 in America. Pretty damn good work if you ask me. All written by Thom. Its true Radiohead don't have any #1 singles. But they do have many many Top 10 singles (Creep, Street Spirit, Paranoid Android, Karma Police, No Surprises, Pyramid Song and There There). Plus who would ever deny the brilliance of other singles like Fake Plastic Trees, High & Dry, Just, My Iron Lung, etc. Oasis is known to have 2 masterpiece albums but nothing since 1995. Thats a long time ago. What followed was a series of lesser returns as the band marched on. Radiohead on the other hand have 4 masterpieces, 2 of them coming post 90s. They also continue to operate as a healthy, functional and peak band in the year 2018. They've done enough. I'd say Radiohead are a bigger global band than Oasis eventually ended up. But, I think Oasis'/NG's songs will influence more people down the line. Maybe it's because, to me at least, Radiohead are all about 'complicating' music (that doesn't make it bad), but it's kind of difficult for me to relate to Thom Yorke. It just comes down to taste. Radiohead evolved. Oasis did not. Oasis shined very very brightly between 1995-1996. They were soon eclipsed by Radiohead. The back to back efforts of Ok Computer and Kid A put them on every magazine around the globe. Ranking at the top of many album of the year lists. Pretty much every American band of the last 20 years has said Radiohead were a huge influence on them. I'm sure its the same for many British bands as well. I was never totally impressed with the UK bands of the 00s that came up via Oasis, I mean is that it? Radiohead were once a extreme guitar band. Dare I say they even rocked harder than Oasis in the mid 90s. Compare The Bends to Morning Glory. Their guitars were at eleven. Oasis went more laid back (which is fine) but people always consider Oasis the rock Gods of British music of the 90s but in 1995, Radiohead out did them in that regard. Even Ok Computer rocked harder than Be Here Now. Lazy and loud guitar solos weren't gonna match what Jonny Greenwood was doing. Bottom line, some people like them, other do not. But enough people like them to merit Thom being in the same league as Noel. For me Noel never got back to his mid 90s hey day. That is a shame.
|
|
|
Post by bt95 on Jul 26, 2018 13:42:09 GMT -5
I'd say Radiohead are a bigger global band than Oasis eventually ended up. But, I think Oasis'/NG's songs will influence more people down the line. Maybe it's because, to me at least, Radiohead are all about 'complicating' music (that doesn't make it bad), but it's kind of difficult for me to relate to Thom Yorke. It just comes down to taste. Radiohead evolved. Oasis did not. Oasis shined very very brightly between 1995-1996. They were soon eclipsed by Radiohead. The back to back efforts of Ok Computer and Kid A put them on every magazine around the globe. Ranking at the top of many album of the year lists. Pretty much every American band of the last 20 years has said Radiohead were a huge influence on them. I'm sure its the same for many British bands as well. I was never totally impressed with the UK bands of the 00s that came up via Oasis, I mean is that it? Radiohead were once a extreme guitar band. Dare I say they even rocked harder than Oasis in the mid 90s. Compare The Bends to Morning Glory. Their guitars were at eleven. Oasis went more laid back (which is fine) but people always consider Oasis the rock Gods of British music of the 90s but in 1995, Radiohead out did them in that regard. Even Ok Computer rocked harder than Be Here Now. Lazy and loud guitar solos weren't gonna match what Jonny Greenwood was doing. Bottom line, some people like them, other do not. But enough people like them to merit Thom being in the same league as Noel. For me Noel never got back to his mid 90s hey day. That is a shame. The problem is exactly that too many British/indie bands in the early 00's shunned Oasis. Because of a snobbery - and there was a snobbery. Not that Radiohead were snobs. But it wasn't 'cool' to like Oasis. But at the end of the day we ended up with a load of spotty students trying to sing about how fucking miserable they were. Nah, fuck that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2018 14:01:03 GMT -5
Mean Mrs. Mustard & morning_rain: Personally I would put Noel above Weller, though I'd agree he's not quite up there with the Beatles. The 94-98 output comes close though bt95 Your friend's comments are very interesting! I'd agree that Noel has found his own style of rock n roll rather than just trying to sound and act like Liam, which he did in the 90s imo. oasisglory Very insightful. New Oasis fans these days are lucky! What you said about Oasis' impact on your personality resonates with me greatly, it wasn't until I discovered this band I learned how to not give a fuck about what anyone says about you. dampcottage Interesting point about the media perception of Noel & Liam, obviously in time that will all fade away and the music will be what they are remembered for. That to me suggests that they will go down in history as some of the all time greats. mossy And rightly so. Lennon2217 Hmm... does Thom Yorke qualify? I mean I know he's prolific and Radiohead have some good tracks (not a huge fan personally) but they haven't really had a lot of hits have they? Are we just judging this on the merits of "hit singles"? That is a little narrow minded. Radiohead have always been an album oriented band and consider their music artistic expression. Some people write music to drink and fuck to, which is also fine. Radiohead have 6 #1 UK Albums, 2 USA #1 albums, along with another 4 albums going Top 3 in America. Pretty damn good work if you ask me. All written by Thom. Its true Radiohead don't have any #1 singles. But they do have many many Top 10 singles (Creep, Street Spirit, Paranoid Android, Karma Police, No Surprises, Pyramid Song and There There). Plus who would ever deny the brilliance of other singles like Fake Plastic Trees, High & Dry, Just, My Iron Lung, etc. Oasis is known to have 2 masterpiece albums but nothing since 1995. Thats a long time ago. What followed was a series of lesser returns as the band marched on. Radiohead on the other hand have 4 masterpieces, 2 of them coming post 90s. They also continue to operate as a healthy, functional and peak band in the year 2018. They've done enough. I agree judging the merits of a songwriter on its hit singles is a bit narrow minded. Songwriters like Alex Chilton, Elliott Smith, Stuart Murdoch, to name a few, are some brilliant songwriters than never had hits. On the Oasis/Radiohead subject though; I love both bands, but I think one has got a special treatment and the other not. For me they BOTH released 2 masterpieces and that's it. Post OKC Radiohead stuff is held in way too high regard by the critics, and I say that while I love KID A and most of Amnesiac. On the "who is the best songwriter of his generation" subject, except for Noel and Thom, I would like to also cite Elliott Smith, Stuart Murdoch, Billy Corgan, Stephen Malkmus and Jason Pierce.
|
|
|
Post by Lennon2217 on Jul 26, 2018 15:02:31 GMT -5
Are we just judging this on the merits of "hit singles"? That is a little narrow minded. Radiohead have always been an album oriented band and consider their music artistic expression. Some people write music to drink and fuck to, which is also fine. Radiohead have 6 #1 UK Albums, 2 USA #1 albums, along with another 4 albums going Top 3 in America. Pretty damn good work if you ask me. All written by Thom. Its true Radiohead don't have any #1 singles. But they do have many many Top 10 singles (Creep, Street Spirit, Paranoid Android, Karma Police, No Surprises, Pyramid Song and There There). Plus who would ever deny the brilliance of other singles like Fake Plastic Trees, High & Dry, Just, My Iron Lung, etc. Oasis is known to have 2 masterpiece albums but nothing since 1995. Thats a long time ago. What followed was a series of lesser returns as the band marched on. Radiohead on the other hand have 4 masterpieces, 2 of them coming post 90s. They also continue to operate as a healthy, functional and peak band in the year 2018. They've done enough. I agree judging the merits of a songwriter on its hit singles is a bit narrow minded. Songwriters like Alex Chilton, Elliott Smith, Stuart Murdoch, to name a few, are some brilliant songwriters than never had hits. On the Oasis/Radiohead subject though; I love both bands, but I think one has got a special treatment and the other not. For me they BOTH released 2 masterpieces and that's it. Post OKC Radiohead stuff is held in way too high regard by the critics, and I say that while I love KID A and most of Amnesiac. On the "who is the best songwriter of his generation" subject, except for Noel and Thom, I would like to also cite Elliott Smith, Stuart Murdoch, Billy Corgan, Stephen Malkmus and Jason Pierce. I’m seeing the Pumpkins next week at Madison Square Garden. I looked at their setlist from the current tour, same set every night, what you realize the amount of hit Billy Corgan has written. It’s stunning the material they are rolling out at gigs. Like Noel he had a huuuuuuuuuge purple patch the entire 90s. Didn’t just talk about songs he wrote, he actually put them all out and continues to keep pumping music out. Some good. Some ok. Some bad. Buy boy oh boy the man can write a tune.
|
|
|
Post by Lennon2217 on Jul 26, 2018 15:10:26 GMT -5
Radiohead evolved. Oasis did not. Oasis shined very very brightly between 1995-1996. They were soon eclipsed by Radiohead. The back to back efforts of Ok Computer and Kid A put them on every magazine around the globe. Ranking at the top of many album of the year lists. Pretty much every American band of the last 20 years has said Radiohead were a huge influence on them. I'm sure its the same for many British bands as well. I was never totally impressed with the UK bands of the 00s that came up via Oasis, I mean is that it? Radiohead were once a extreme guitar band. Dare I say they even rocked harder than Oasis in the mid 90s. Compare The Bends to Morning Glory. Their guitars were at eleven. Oasis went more laid back (which is fine) but people always consider Oasis the rock Gods of British music of the 90s but in 1995, Radiohead out did them in that regard. Even Ok Computer rocked harder than Be Here Now. Lazy and loud guitar solos weren't gonna match what Jonny Greenwood was doing. Bottom line, some people like them, other do not. But enough people like them to merit Thom being in the same league as Noel. For me Noel never got back to his mid 90s hey day. That is a shame. The problem is exactly that too many British/indie bands in the early 00's shunned Oasis. Because of a snobbery - and there was a snobbery. Not that Radiohead were snobs. But it wasn't 'cool' to like Oasis. But at the end of the day we ended up with a load of spotty students trying to sing about how fucking miserable they were. Nah, fuck that. I mean Noel wasn’t exactly singing about drinking champagne from stripper’s boots post 1997. SOTSOG is a very dark and dreary album. Force of Nature, Just Getting Older, Probably All In The Mind, The Importance of Beig Idle, Part of The Queue, Lord Don’t Slow Me Down, most of DOYS songs. I wouldn’t say he was being much different than Thom in those years for song subjects. A lot of mundane life circumstances creeping into Noel’s body of work.
|
|
|
Post by bt95 on Jul 26, 2018 15:35:07 GMT -5
The problem is exactly that too many British/indie bands in the early 00's shunned Oasis. Because of a snobbery - and there was a snobbery. Not that Radiohead were snobs. But it wasn't 'cool' to like Oasis. But at the end of the day we ended up with a load of spotty students trying to sing about how fucking miserable they were. Nah, fuck that. I mean Noel wasn’t exactly singing about drinking champagne from stripper’s boots post 1997. SOTSOG is a very dark and dreary album. Force of Nature, Just Getting Older, Probably All In The Mind, The Importance of Beig Idle, Part of The Queue, Lord Don’t Slow Me Down, most of DOYS songs. I wouldn’t say he was being much different than Thom in those years for song subjects. A lot of mundane life circumstances creeping into Noel’s body of work. SOTSOG was clearly Noel at his lowest eb. I happen to like the melancholy, but the songs weren't strong enough to back that up (i.e. Sunday Morning Call). I don't think any of those songs you've listed are miserable or mundane songs though. They're all tinged with the Northern arrogance and attitude. I hate to sound like a nationalist!!, but it's one of those things you kind of just get depending on where your from - I suppose that blurs my opinion a bit. When Noel sings 'I lost my faith in the summer time, cos it don't stop raining', if you've ever spent a summer in the UK (weirdly enough, just not this one currently) you'll know it's not Noel taking a philosophical outlook on the meaning of life through the weather, it's just him saying it always bloody rains. Noel's ability to make a mundane line something extraordinary and meaningful to so many people is one of his greatest talents. I just can't get into Radiohead. I like their hits, but they bore me. They always will, unless maybe one day I have the 'awakening', but bare in mind I was listening to High And Dry/Creep/Karma Police long before I started listening to Oasis properly. I'm sure they're all nice blokes, and I know for a fact they're incredibly talented musicians. But I find them dreary and dull, and I don't like the way they're hailed as the way 'that music should be' by some critics.
|
|
|
Post by Bonehead's Barber on Jul 26, 2018 15:50:03 GMT -5
He's in the second tier, I'd say. Below Lennon / McCartney above Ray Davies. I don't really know who else would be in his tier... MAYBE Weller, but I'd say that Oasis had far more hits and socially defining tunes than The Jam ever did (though I am a 90s kid, so I wasn't there for The Jam)
|
|
|
Post by mossy on Jul 26, 2018 16:00:55 GMT -5
He's in the second tier, I'd say. Below Lennon / McCartney above Ray Davies. I don't really know who else would be in his tier... MAYBE Weller, but I'd say that Oasis had far more hits and socially defining tunes than The Jam ever did (though I am a 90s kid, so I wasn't there for The Jam) Second tier is where it’s at. Who wants to be a first tier try hard? X
|
|
|
Post by mossy on Jul 26, 2018 16:01:35 GMT -5
Mean Mrs. Mustard & morning_rain: Personally I would put Noel above Weller, though I'd agree he's not quite up there with the Beatles. The 94-98 output comes close though bt95 Your friend's comments are very interesting! I'd agree that Noel has found his own style of rock n roll rather than just trying to sound and act like Liam, which he did in the 90s imo. oasisglory Very insightful. New Oasis fans these days are lucky! What you said about Oasis' impact on your personality resonates with me greatly, it wasn't until I discovered this band I learned how to not give a fuck about what anyone says about you. dampcottage Interesting point about the media perception of Noel & Liam, obviously in time that will all fade away and the music will be what they are remembered for. That to me suggests that they will go down in history as some of the all time greats. mossy And rightly so. Lennon2217 Hmm... does Thom Yorke qualify? I mean I know he's prolific and Radiohead have some good tracks (not a huge fan personally) but they haven't really had a lot of hits have they? Are we just judging this on the merits of "hit singles"? That is a little narrow minded. Radiohead have always been an album oriented band and consider their music artistic expression. Some people write music to drink and fuck to, which is also fine. Radiohead have 6 #1 UK Albums, 2 USA #1 albums, along with another 4 albums going Top 3 in America. Pretty damn good work if you ask me. All written by Thom. Its true Radiohead don't have any #1 singles. But they do have many many Top 10 singles (Creep, Street Spirit, Paranoid Android, Karma Police, No Surprises, Pyramid Song and There There). Plus who would ever deny the brilliance of other singles like Fake Plastic Trees, High & Dry, Just, My Iron Lung, etc. Oasis is known to have 2 masterpiece albums but nothing since 1995. Thats a long time ago. What followed was a series of lesser returns as the band marched on. Radiohead on the other hand have 4 masterpieces, 2 of them coming post 90s. They also continue to operate as a healthy, functional and peak band in the year 2018. They've done enough. You don’t drink and fuck to Radiohead? Weirdo. X
|
|