|
Post by truefaith on Jan 31, 2012 9:53:57 GMT -5
I like High Horse Lady but that was because Liam left to get married and never finished Record Machine. I thought LDSMD sounded terrible with Liam on it (although to be fair it was probably just a demo). HHL is one of Noel's worse ripp off of an old blues song. No interest at all in this song. Here's the link if you don't know it. As for RM, you really wants me to believe that after 3 years waiting for releasing their new album, Oasis couldn't go a few more days in the studio after Liam got married ? And I'm pretty sure that Noel said the song was meant to be on DBTT too. So if it wasn't recorded at both occasion it's because Noel didn't wanted to for wathever reason, Liam's getting married can't seriously be one of them. As for LDSMD Liam's version is great and it's just a demo.
|
|
|
Post by truefaith on Jan 31, 2012 10:41:21 GMT -5
You're wrong about Noel's singing killing the magic formula Noel singing was a part of Oasis' greatness from the get go. Sad Song/Take Me Away, etc were there in the DM era. Masterplan, Step Out, DLBIA, half of Acquiesce, Talk Tonight among many others from MGlory. These are all fantastic songs from their glory period, many of which are among their all time classics. Noel ALWAYS sang. The reason later Oasis albums weren't as good is for one reason alone---that the songs weren't as good. For various reasons (because Noel picked the wrong ones, let LAG have too many slots on the albums and wasn't writing quite as many great ones himself). Noel singing for me was the highlight of late period Oasis, when Liam's voice was a shell of its former self. Sure Noel was singing from the begining, but mostly b sides. (great b sides that's for sure). But between 2002 and 2008, Noel has let Liam sings only 8 of his songs. That's shocking ! (PAITM, SCYHO, The Hindu Times , Lyla, LTBL, BIU, The Turning and TSOTL) And he let some great songs aside for years like RM. And I've no problem with Noel singing TIOBI for example, but Noel singing MF wasn't the right choice. From 2002, Noel was just singing too much IMO. If he had continued with one track as lead singer on the album, an a few more on b sides, and didn't let the others write so much, that would have been great. So basically if he hadn't changed the oasis formula that much, even if the songs weren't as great as they used to be.
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Jan 31, 2012 12:08:14 GMT -5
I agree, EOTR is a truly great song, it's not a 10 simply because Liam isn't singing it. I mean, i love Noel's vocals but is it as good as it would be with Liam? no... so it can't be a 10 imo, that's just me. Aside from that one, everything else on the HFBs album just can't touch the stuff from the 94/95/96, and that includes the b sides, which as well all know were in some cases better than the stuff on the albums. Not a knock on Noel, since he wrote it all himself, the delivery just isn't the same, and obviously the inspiration and magic from those days and those songs are basically untouchable. So the Masterplan isn't a 10 because Liam isn't singing on it? So Don't Look Back in Anger isn't a 10 because Liam isn't singing on it? So forth and so on.
|
|
|
Post by spaneli on Jan 31, 2012 17:54:04 GMT -5
I agree, EOTR is a truly great song, it's not a 10 simply because Liam isn't singing it. I mean, i love Noel's vocals but is it as good as it would be with Liam? no... so it can't be a 10 imo, that's just me. Aside from that one, everything else on the HFBs album just can't touch the stuff from the 94/95/96, and that includes the b sides, which as well all know were in some cases better than the stuff on the albums. Not a knock on Noel, since he wrote it all himself, the delivery just isn't the same, and obviously the inspiration and magic from those days and those songs are basically untouchable. So the Masterplan isn't a 10 because Liam isn't singing on it? So Don't Look Back in Anger isn't a 10 because Liam isn't singing on it? So forth and so on. True And to Silence, in your opinion, nothing touches the stuff from the Oasis hey day, but in my opinion I find that to be untrue. What makes HFB's a great album is because EOTR is on there and IIHAG. IIHAG is probably the best track Noel has done since DGA and EOTR is definitely the best he has done since DGA. In my opinion, it's one of things that separates his album from Beady Eye's. (probably gonna piss someone off that I'm comparing the two). But I can put EOTR on WSTMG and not hear a drop off in quality. I can put IIHAG on WTSMG and not notice a drop off in quality. I can put either of those two songs on The Masterplan and definitely not notice a drop off in quality. HFB is a great album because EOTR and IIHAG would and could stand along some of the best Oasis tracks and not feel bashful or weighed down by the task. It's a great album because even the second tier songs, AKA...BA, TDOYAM, and RM would be album highlights on any of the post 2000 era albums, and would have been damn good b-sides, even during the hey day of Oasis. Even the lower tier songs, STC, AKA...WAL, SOTWB, would be damn good tracks on any of the post 2000 albums. I know everyone has their own taste, but to dismiss that entire album, save for two songs just for "delivery", is b.s. in my opinion. Delivery's got nothing to do with it. The songs on HFB are genuinely great and many stand up through any era. In my opinion, Noel had the goods and put them across the finish line and proved many of his doubters wrong. Or the people who said that he wasn't capable of writing or making an album at high level.
|
|
|
Post by truefaith on Jan 31, 2012 18:17:37 GMT -5
For me the question isn't that HFB is a good album, EOTR, IIAG and RM would have been great even in 1996, ok the rest would have been good tracks on the 2000 albums, but the question is not here. The songs are good, but they could have been better with Oasis, aka with Liam. Just because having one the best singer of all time singing a great song by his brother has usually reached the sky. It's not dismissing an album to wonder what if, it doesn't make the album less good. It's just that the level of greatness EOTR could have achieved with Liam is frustrating. It was a fight in Paris away to be sung by him.
I don't miss Liam on TDOYAM or Alone on the rope. But if when I listen a great HFB songs I miss Liam, then there is a flaw in the delivery for me. If it doesn't do it for you because "oasis is over", great but for me it mainly means that Noel couldn't give me a delivery that would make me forget Liam. But how could he ? Liam is one the best singer of all time.
|
|
|
Post by Silence Dogood on Jan 31, 2012 18:19:17 GMT -5
I listen to Noel's album knowing he had most of these songs up his sleeve and could have used them as Oasis songs and had Liam singing on them. Liam's vocals could have taken them to another level. exactly but there are those Noel supporters who don't wanna hear any of that. It's rather very simple really. If Liam's voice would take song "x" to a whole 'nother level, how could we say said song is a 10? it would automatically have to be something lower. it's only common sense, it's called logic but again, a select part of Noel's fanbase simply hate hearing this.
|
|
|
Post by Silence Dogood on Jan 31, 2012 18:30:11 GMT -5
So the Masterplan isn't a 10 because Liam isn't singing on it? So Don't Look Back in Anger isn't a 10 because Liam isn't singing on it? So forth and so on. True And to Silence, in your opinion, nothing touches the stuff from the Oasis hey day, but in my opinion I find that to be untrue. What makes HFB's a great album is because EOTR is on there and IIHAG. IIHAG is probably the best track Noel has done since DGA and EOTR is definitely the best he has done since DGA. In my opinion, it's one of things that separates his album from Beady Eye's. (probably gonna piss someone off that I'm comparing the two). #1 see the thing is, that's just your opinion, nothing more. Most people will tell(again, most people in the world, not some internet furom) you, and that includes most critics that this stuff is simply not as good as anything Oasis put out in DM, MG or TM. That's straight up common knowledge. People may think it's the best he's done since then, that doesn't mean it's as good. You may wanna call it "the rest of the world's opinion" #2 No one has said EOTR isn't great. The song is beautiful and it is a great song obviously. What we are discussing is that it would've been better with Liam on vocals. #3 I personally am not gonna "get pissed" for you bringing BDI in the discussion to make a comparison. I am just gonna ask you that you remember this and don't get bothered when other people do it the future. that's all. NEXT....
|
|
|
Post by supernovadragon on Jan 31, 2012 18:37:54 GMT -5
Just to throw my two pence worth here, just wanted to say not ONCE have I even thought about Liam singing ANY of HFB songs. They ain't part of the "What If" game because they was written/recorded (even re-recorded) for this album and this album only (save for RM and STC which both sound too similar to the demos from DBTT its almost appalling).
This is, to me at least, the same as creating the "8th Oasis Album" by mixing together both albums. They was written and recorded at different times, this is truely pointless and I absolutly no ground in anything like this. As Liam sings on KFAD "You can carry regrets but they won't let you live." Don't get yourself down in saying, what if etc on songs that Noel is singing on HIS solo album.
|
|
|
Post by spaneli on Jan 31, 2012 19:42:57 GMT -5
True And to Silence, in your opinion, nothing touches the stuff from the Oasis hey day, but in my opinion I find that to be untrue. What makes HFB's a great album is because EOTR is on there and IIHAG. IIHAG is probably the best track Noel has done since DGA and EOTR is definitely the best he has done since DGA. In my opinion, it's one of things that separates his album from Beady Eye's. (probably gonna piss someone off that I'm comparing the two). #1 see the thing is, that's just your opinion, nothing more. Most people will tell(again, most people in the world, not some internet furom) you, and that includes most critics that this stuff is simply not as good as anything Oasis put out in DM, MG or TM. That's straight up common knowledge. People may think it's the best he's done since then, that doesn't mean it's as good. You may wanna call it "the rest of the world's opinion" #2 No one has said EOTR isn't great. The song is beautiful and it is a great song obviously. What we are discussing is that it would've been better with Liam on vocals. #3 I personally am not gonna "get pissed" for you bringing BDI in the discussion to make a comparison. I am just gonna ask you that you remember this and don't get bothered when other people do it the future. that's all. NEXT.... First thing, I think I cealry stated "in my opinion" enough times. As par rules toward this forum. Secondly, I'd like to know how you have found the time to take a poll of almost all the critics, forum members, and fans, to find out they think they find this not to be up to par with Oasis' stuff. I get that it's your opinion, but don't give the "most people" line as if you have a pulse on the thoughts of everyone who has listened to the album. Thirdly, I'm not arguing as toward the legitimacy of saying whether a song or would or would not be better with Liam's vocals. What I am saying is that for that to be one of the largest determining factors as why a song is not a 10 or not, is b.s.. In my opinion. (need to state that because one can't live on this forum with saying, "in my opinion.'). As the some might get pissed line. I think we all know that "some" doesn't equal "you". Unless I have a bad dictionary. "Some" was being used as a plural, rather than a sungular. Lastly, don't end a post with "NEXT". It's belittling and presumptuous. Not a very gracious way to end a debate which really hasn't ended.
|
|
retrolego
Oasis Roadie
Walking to the sound of my favorite tune
Posts: 279
|
Post by retrolego on Jan 31, 2012 20:28:53 GMT -5
To me it seems natural to imagine what Liam may have sounded like on a Noel song but to say that someone can't rate a song a 10 just because it doesnt have Liam singing is ridiculous. This sort of theory means that no song ever can be rated a ten becuase the guitar, drums, bass, vocals could have been played better in a different way on the track but because we will never know then it automatically downgraded.
If however a theoretical version of EOTR with Liam singing did surface and it turned out the song was better then it would be more logical to rate the Liam one a 10 and the Noel one a 9 but because this wont actually happen the Noel sung one canbe rated a 10. It is also entirely possible that the Liam sung version is not better as it is total speculation and we will never know so to instantly dismiss the Noel version as not as good as Liams version would be and vice versa is nonsensical.
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Jan 31, 2012 20:55:14 GMT -5
IIHAG is literally the best Gallagher released song within the last decade, if not even beyond that. Can't get enough of that amazing track.
|
|
|
Post by gdforever on Jan 31, 2012 20:57:21 GMT -5
To me it seems natural to imagine what Liam may have sounded like on a Noel song but to say that someone can't rate a song a 10 just because it doesnt have Liam singing is ridiculous. This sort of theory means that no song ever can be rated a ten becuase the guitar, drums, bass, vocals could have been played better in a different way on the track but because we will never know then it automatically downgraded. If however a theoretical version of EOTR with Liam singing did surface and it turned out the song was better then it would be more logical to rate the Liam one a 10 and the Noel one a 9 but because this wont actually happen the Noel sung one canbe rated a 10. It is also entirely possible that the Liam sung version is not better as it is total speculation and we will never know so to instantly dismiss the Noel version as not as good as Liams version would be and vice versa is nonsensical. Exactly my point. Thank you. Downgrading a song from a 10 because a group doesn't have your favorite singer in it? No way, IMO. And like you say...it's not a certainty that Liam's vocals would have been mega. Which is what I meant when I said about the SCYHO comments. I don't think that Liam's voice significantly helped that song. In fact I think that vocal is atrocious. Same with LTBL. Those being the last 2 really epic Oasis ballads that Liam sang. Neither of the vocal really blow me away. That is not to say that I don't think that Liam has a great voice. Without a doubt Liam has better vocal tone than Noel. But the assumption that obviously Liam would obviously have put out an amazing vocal al la DGA, Wonderwall, Cast No Shadow, Slide Away doesn't fly with me. He isn't flawless in studio...he's better in studio than live...but hardly faultless. Liam voice is much better on DGSS. But I actually think that his vocals have improved because of the fact that Andy and Gem build this song around his voice and they used some vocal effects on several tracks. Liam wouldn't have had that benfit if Oasis had stayed together. I have a feeling we would have been more likely to get something closer strained vocal like on SCYHO or LTBL than one of those truly epic 1990's Oasis ballads or even the vocals on the lesser ballads on DGSS.
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Jan 31, 2012 21:17:03 GMT -5
Look, BDI are good for what they are: There album is just above average, and they put on a live show. But it holds nothing to NGHFB, bar energy.
Noel, with NGHFB, has shown exactly why he should have been writing all songs on the albums, despite how good the likes of TUTS are.
BDI doesn't have a EOTR. BDI doesn't have a IIHAG. BDI doesn't have a BA. The list goes on. Noel's music has more layers, it's more mature, it has better lyrics, and has the emotional connection just as Oasis' best songs had.
I think the best comparison re: this discussion is the case study of RM and TBGO. Both are very similar in their elements. But TBGO is one dimensional, doesn't go anywhere, and has literally no dynamics. Decent song, but if authored by Noel it would have ended up like RM, which has varying degrees and dynamism, concluding in that excellent middle eighth......
|
|
|
Post by BlueJay on Jan 31, 2012 21:39:49 GMT -5
I think it's a little pathetic that a mutually exclusive Beady Eye thread, in which I was putting forth what I think their next album has to be, has turned into something that mirrors about a thousand other threads on this forum, the endless what ifs with Liam and Noel. Beady Eye have about as much to do with Noel as Bob Dole does with legitimate politics. It's almost as absurd as a claim made by NL4E a little while ago that IIHAG should have been on Be Here Now. Like time distortion isn't already fucked enough. While I'm here though, I'll throw a few thoughts into the wishing fountain. In regards to your claim Spaneli, that IIHAG and EOTR would nestle well into WTSMG, you fail to see that is a disillusioned pipedream distorted by perception of novelty. I don't claim to be Nostradamus (he was too aloof for my liking), but I think you take for granted what you are already well familiar with. Sidling IIHAG against WW and DLBIA would make it seem crass, brittle and Noel by numbers - the same that is said so often about Little By Little. Had 'Hello' or 'Roll With It' or 'Hey Now' been removed from WTSMG in favour of 'Rockin' Chair', 'Acquiesce' or 'Underneath the SKy', it is the former group of songs that we would be hailing amongst the greatest b-sides of the modern era. Thus, the reputation and standing of the latter group would have dimmed significantly, as they wouldn't be the lost golden tracks that we so covet - the mythicism that so often coats Oasis' b-sides. I use this analogy because had IIHAG not been so much more anthemic and melodically accessible than anything Oasis released post DBTT (for the record 'The Importance of Being Idle' is still the greatest NG composition post Be Here Now, not IIHAG), had it been released in the era in which Noel was writing classic songs as fast as any contemporary songwriter since the sixties, it would have been swept under the haze of more accomplished songs and no doubt relegated to b-side status. In fact, its tame lyrical content would make an appearance on The Masterplan debatable, I mean at least HTWA and TT were honest, heartfelt odes to what he was feeling at the time ...what does IIHAG have going for it? IIHAG and EOTR were released during an era where it is easy for a very good Noel song to stand out amongst his weaker tracks, they were released on an album in which they clearly rise above the others around them. Perception is distorted. It's like saying that had Wonderwall been released today, at the advent of the Youtube and Spotify era, where exposure is leaps and bounds ahead of what it was fifteen years ago, it would have gone number one in America and had 300 millions views on Youtube. In regards to EOTR, I don't know what people would be willing to expect with a Liam rendition of it anyway. Noel's vocal on it is up there with TIOBI as one of the best he's ever done. What Liam voice would make it better? His 1990s voice maybe, but his post-2000 voice? Not a chance. Like 'Keep the Dream Alive' and 'Stop Crying Your Heart Out' (as gdforever has so rightly has pointed out numerous times) before it, his ragged and weary voice would have most likely destroyed the song, whilst Noel's clearly takes up to that 'other' level, that so many are presumptuosly associating with a Liam take on it. Everyone here was taken aback with Noel's performance on it the first time we heard it, it is one of the few occasions where his power and instensity is almost on par with his brother at his height. You get something absolutely brilliant and yet you ask for something more. You sound like a bunch of ungrateful gluttons to me. I just realized that despite my bemoaning about how this thread has gone off topic, I have probably gone off topic more than anyone else here. This is awkward
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Jan 31, 2012 21:54:04 GMT -5
Beady Eye have about as much to do with Noel as Bob Dole does with legitimate politics. It's almost as absurd as a claim made by NL4E a little while ago that IIHAG should have been on Be Here Now. Please find that quote. I don't think I have EVER said that - it doesn't even sound like me - no way would I have ever endorsed that song for the bloated BHN. Never. (I had previously said that The Good Rebel could have been on BHN, or that The Good Rebel could have been from the BHN era, but never EVER did I say that about IIHAG). However, I do stand by my prior assessments that IIHAG could have been on WTSMG. If you're going to quote people, please do so correctly. If this was a political debate, you would have just lost the election based on a grotesque misquotation. Who are you? Barack Obama? Facts, please.
|
|
|
Post by masterplan2011 on Feb 1, 2012 6:06:42 GMT -5
As Liam sung Noel writtens songs for years the inclination to wonder who should sing which Noel written song is natural. Most Noel sung songs I just can't imagine Liam singing and it just wudn't work like TIOBI being the obvious example, he would have ruined that song.
However with NGHFB we know potenially that Liam woud have sung RM, STC and maybe one of EOTR and IFHAG if not both if they had of been released as Oasis songs. I'd agree that saying Liam would have took them to a new level is speculative and the idea of a song never reachig a so called 10/10 because Liam didn't sing it is ridiculous. Yes, Liams voice can make a big impact for instance I wudn't really class Slide Away a classic if I just heard Noel's version, Liam elevates it to a whole new level but there are so many great Noel sung songs where you wouldn't even think about Liam singing them. I think that's the key word 'think'. When I listened to TDOYAM, WAL, DO, BA and more I never even thought about Liam singing them but with others I automotically imagined Liam singing them. Similarily and this could be controversial, I think Noel would have done a better vocal on I'm Outta Time (I've said it now!) I can just imagine his voice suiting it better.
|
|
|
Post by truefaith on Feb 1, 2012 6:17:09 GMT -5
If we think about Liam during a Noel's sung song then it's means his vocals weren't enough good to make us forget about Liam.
It's not saying the song is not great, it's saying the song could have been better. It's not weird to imagine it, it's only natural. And constantly using the only bad vocal Liam has ever done (KTDA) to justify that Liam wouldn't have been that great on EOTR is ridiculous. His voice on LTBL and SCYO is the main interest of those medium ballads.
Of course on a great song like EOTR, that Noel was certainly planning for him before the split, Liam would have been great, the song screams his powerfull voice, Noel is just trying to imitate Liam's kind of delivery, same thing on RM and Dream on.
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Feb 1, 2012 7:13:20 GMT -5
Actually, forgive me, I meant to say that you thought the NGHFB album as a whole should have been Oasis' Be Here Now, the third album after WTSMG, not IIHAG in particluar. On that note, I didn't have to go far to find some of your own quotes in one of your own threads in the fact + fiction section... If NGHFB was the follow up to WTSMG, it would have only built upon Oasis' legacy, instead of declining after the bloated BHN (no matter how much we all love that album). zing... That being said, I did specify that should this album have followed the likes of WTSMG, it would have been praised, thus Liam's vocals would have still been in good form during that period. zing... I hate politics, couldn't care less. But in this case, you would be very humiliated, as would your narrow minded followers. What are you possibly talking about? Not once in those quotes did I say IIHAG should have been on BHN. Not once. Maybe you misunderstood. What those quotes you picked are saying is the NGHFB should have followed WTSMG (which is VERY different from saying NGHFB songs should have been on BHN). A little thought exercise for you: If Oasis albums went as such - DM, WTSMG, NGHFB....it would NOT mean NGHFB would have been BHN. I have no idea what you're thinking.....When people discuss that the Masterplan should have been Oasis' 3rd album, do you think they mean the songs should have been included on BHN, too? No idea why you're muddling this up. Think about it.
|
|
dion
Oasis Roadie
Posts: 362
|
Post by dion on Feb 1, 2012 7:24:58 GMT -5
Calling Oasis' 3rd album Noel Gallaghers High Flying Birds would have caused some friction
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Feb 1, 2012 8:05:30 GMT -5
Calling Oasis' 3rd album Noel Gallaghers High Flying Birds would have caused some friction Could you imagine Liam's reaction? "I'm a what? I'm not yer fucking bird, fuck that"
|
|
|
Post by themanwithnoname on Feb 1, 2012 10:52:50 GMT -5
Similarily and this could be controversial, I think Noel would have done a better vocal on I'm Outta Time (I've said it now!) I can just imagine his voice suiting it better. Ha! Never thought of that but you're right, that would have really suited Noel's voice and may well have been even better. That would have been classic if Liam had written a song and told Noel he could sing it By the way NL4E, think you're on the wrong track when you compare your statement that NGHFB should have been Oasis's third album with people saying the same about The Masterplan. The fact is that Noel COULD have used the songs that were on The Masterplan for the third album because he'd already written them - that's obviously not the case with NGHFB. Still, I know what you mean. Basically the solo album showcases the fact he can still write amazing tunes and that aort of quality hasn't really been consistently apparent since Morning Glory.
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Feb 1, 2012 11:23:17 GMT -5
Actually, now that I think about it, EOTR would have been almost identical to SCYHO with Liam's vocals. With that being said, I'm glad it was handled by Noel as Noel did a phenomenal job.
Oh, and I wouldn't want Liam anywhere near IIHAG. That song is utter perfection.
|
|
|
Post by spaneli on Feb 1, 2012 11:41:34 GMT -5
While I'm here though, I'll throw a few thoughts into the wishing fountain. In regards to your claim Spaneli, that IIHAG and EOTR would nestle well into WTSMG, you fail to see that is a disillusioned pipedream distorted by perception of novelty. I don't claim to be Nostradamus (he was too aloof for my liking), but I think you take for granted what you are already well familiar with. Sidling IIHAG against WW and DLBIA would make it seem crass, brittle and Noel by numbers - the same that is said so often about Little By Little. I think you take me a bit too literal. I never said that IIHAG or EOTR would be perfect fits on either of the albums. I said that they could stand along those songs. These are two completely different statements.
|
|
|
Post by truefaith on Feb 1, 2012 12:22:41 GMT -5
Actually, now that I think about it, EOTR would have been almost identical to SCYHO with Liam's vocals. With that being said, I'm glad it was handled by Noel as Noel did a phenomenal job. Oh, and I wouldn't want Liam anywhere near IIHAG. That song is utter perfection. Yes, if only Noel had sung every songs on DM and MG and every other album. Can you imagine the phenomenal job he would have done on CS, WW, Cigs and alcoho, supersonic, slide away, SMS, My big Mouth and so on. How great could it be if Liam was never a part of Oasis. Imagine how awesome Knebworth could have been, sure Noel solo at Knebworth would have sold out at least 3 more nights without this monkey moron calling himself a frontman. Too bad he made a band with his brother, waiting 20 years to finally hear him solo was too long.
|
|
|
Post by noasabian on Feb 1, 2012 12:39:08 GMT -5
|
|