|
Post by howsoonisnow on Nov 24, 2011 5:11:23 GMT -5
Trust me, being compared to Pete Doherty is a compliment to me. I wouldn't trade my life for his, but the man is a legend in a way that surpasses even Liam Gallagher, he's really beyond the ordinary human in that way. lol, thank you that was a good laugh.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 24, 2011 5:49:16 GMT -5
Yep, I love Pete Doherty as well, the man is mesmerising. I saw a lecture he gave in my college a few years ago on poetry. It was the most fascinating thing I've ever heard, he has a way with words that man does. He got me hooked on poetry and songwriting and all that. Then he gets a load of shit in the press, pisses me off. I could on but I know it's off-topic. Trust me, being compared to Pete Doherty is a compliment to me. I wouldn't trade my life for his, but the man is a legend in a way that surpasses even Liam Gallagher, he's really beyond the ordinary human in that way. In the end, you could be a Pete Doherty or Kurt Cobain, and be a legend beyond life, but I'd rather be a legend in my own life, and live a proper life. Doherty is, at best, a scummy junkie who was jailed for stealing from his best mate. At worst, he has been involved to varying degrees in the well-publicised deaths of two other people, both incidents being very open to a direct involvement. he is a total waste of a human being, and the only thing he has in common with Liam Gallagher is fathering a chlid by the same woman.
|
|
|
Post by masterplan2011 on Nov 27, 2011 14:37:59 GMT -5
Trust me, being compared to Pete Doherty is a compliment to me. I wouldn't trade my life for his, but the man is a legend in a way that surpasses even Liam Gallagher, he's really beyond the ordinary human in that way. In the end, you could be a Pete Doherty or Kurt Cobain, and be a legend beyond life, but I'd rather be a legend in my own life, and live a proper life. Doherty is, at best, a scummy junkie who was jailed for stealing from his best mate. At worst, he has been involved to varying degrees in the well-publicised deaths of two other people, both incidents being very open to a direct involvement. he is a total waste of a human being, and the only thing he has in common with Liam Gallagher is fathering a chlid by the same woman. Total waste of a human being you say, have you even listened to the Libertines? Many people people fall victim to drugs and it is so easy to call them wasters and junkies but the fact is it is hard to get out of that cycle. Liam and Noel were both on drugs for many years so are they scummy junkies or even John Lennon was on every kind of drug during his life but he still wrote brilliant music. I'm not advocating drug usage but you can't call Pete Doherty a waste of a human being for taking drugs. People have different musical tastes I suppose but listen to the Libertines two albums and tell me that he hasn't contributed something very positive to this world.
|
|
|
Post by Bittersweet Split on Nov 27, 2011 16:06:14 GMT -5
You're talking out of your ass mate.
Nobody's denying that he fucks up (constantly), but with the way people go on about it, it's suddenly worse than the War in Iraq
|
|
|
Post by SleepFreak on Dec 5, 2011 19:19:06 GMT -5
I missed the High Flying Birds gig but went to the Beady Eye one and it was a great show but I think once again this has gotta be the Apples and Oranges comparison.
I mean gig opener 4Letter Word from Beady Eye or an Oasis song from High Flying Birds?.... People who want to hear Oasis songs will truly enjoy the Noel show and Oasis fans who like Beady Eye will have come to expect only Beady Eye songs at their gigs.
At the San Francisco gig when World Outside My Room ended and Liam told the crowd that Sons of the Stage is the last song, I realized I wanted to hear more from Beady Eye but they just played all their songs.
I still listen to DGSS and have grown bored of NGHFB, I prefer Liam's voice over Noel's hands down.
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Dec 7, 2011 12:20:41 GMT -5
Noel for me.
Noel is worth the $60. BDI aren't worth the $40.
|
|
|
Post by flockofcardinals on Dec 7, 2011 12:57:40 GMT -5
Having seen both now it is not even close.
Noel's show was ten times better. Better songs, better atmosphere.
|
|
|
Post by youandmegirl on Dec 7, 2011 13:17:36 GMT -5
Noel for me. Noel is worth the $60. BDI aren't worth the $40. Noel Gallagher's High Flying < $40 * $60 = Beady Eye >= $-20, to be fair
|
|
|
Post by andymorris on Dec 7, 2011 13:39:42 GMT -5
BDI: enjoyable but their best song is the opener, its going downhill after that... NGHFB: huge.
The end.
|
|
|
Post by youandmegirl on Dec 7, 2011 13:42:58 GMT -5
BDI: enjoyable but their best song is the opener, its going downhill after that... NGHFB: huge. The end. "huge"....relative to what? or rather, in what measure? (To what end?)
|
|
|
Post by jilliam on Dec 7, 2011 16:56:06 GMT -5
Can a newbie chime in here? ;D I saw Beady Eye at Rock Werchter this past summer, and NGHFB in San Francisco four days ago. It's hard to compare because the settings were totally different -- 7,000 young people packed into a rain-soaked tent in Belgium versus 2,000 middle-aged people forced to stand in front of their assigned seats in a jewelbox theater in California. But I can say that at the Beady Eye gig my attention never wandered, my mind never left the music, and I never stopped dancing. It was a totally consuming rock & roll experience. Liam is an amazing frontman. Yes, I certainly enjoyed Noel's show, and there were a number of songs (hello, "Record Machine"!) that completely swept me away. But there were other songs where I found myself disengaged, studying the lighting or wondering who ironed Noel's nice white shirt. Let's put it this way: for Noel, I only got tickets for the San Francisco show, but next week for Beady Eye I'll be going to both San Francisco and Los Angeles. THIS!!! Same here, I went to both Noels gigs thinking they were going to be rockin and they weren't. The vibe was incredibly mellow, ppl texting throughout the entire gig, facebooking, having full blown conversations, ppl arriving mid way through the set etc etc. Noel may have the better quality songs but, what's the point if you cant deliver them? I noticed that the only time his gigs picked up was when he played OASIS songs and WAL, you take those 9 Oasis songs out and what kind of gig do you really think there's going to be? BE, the entire time I was glued to the stage, Liam is the REAL DEAL, he has the ability to keep his audience completely captivated something Noel lacks. As for any more Noel gigs, I'll still go but, I'm not doing multiple shows. BE, I'll definitely travel to see them. Pissed I didn't go see them the day before in Frisco. Too far and not enough time off from work to go to the midwest and catch those gigs. galpsych, it was very cool meeting you at the gig. K++
|
|
|
Post by jilliam on Dec 7, 2011 16:58:27 GMT -5
Noel for me. Noel is worth the $60. BDI aren't worth the $40. Have you been to a BE show?
|
|
|
Post by howsoonisnow on Dec 7, 2011 17:43:53 GMT -5
Oasis was an amazing live act, we had a rock n roll show by Liam (MG, C&A, Lyla...) some mid tempo moment by Noel (HTWA,TIOBI,...) and some anthems by Liam (Supersonic, Live forever, Wonderwall) and Noel (DLBIA).
Now, what are we stuck with?
Still a good rock n roll show by Liam but with a lack of songs, no anthems, no real deal song that make you shiver, but still an amazing frontman, a great band and a fucking rock n roll energy.
On the other hand, we have a mid tempo gigs, with absolutely no rock n roll energy, with nostalgia (supersonic, wonderwall), with an average band (and an horrible drumer), an average frontman, classy but not charismatic enough and not relax enough and not with an amazing voice at all (we can barely hear him in the mix), and still some great moments with Oasis anthems (HTWA,DLBIA).
So there's no winner here, no surprise, Liam's an amazing born frontman, Noel is an amazing born songwritter. Separatly their show will always be good but never even close to Oasis magic.
So maybe for now Noel has the best show, but it's mostly because of few of his solo songs and the 9 oasis songs. Not at all because the performance is better than BDI. Next year, BDI will have an hoppefully better second album and will play some Oasis songs. We'll see if everyone's so crazy about supersonic in accoustic after that.
Anyway, between the Noel's album and his live show, it's now very obvious how Liam was essential to Oasis. Just sayin' in case some people still think Oasis was just about Noel.
|
|
|
Post by gdforever on Dec 7, 2011 18:22:10 GMT -5
Personally, I find it harder to find a band that plays a set full of songs I love than I do finding a band playing a set of prodominantly fair-to-middling songs with energy. Frankly...there are a lot of those around.
That is why I made the effort to travel to see Noel and I didn't make the effort to travel to see BDI.
I can find energetic bands with generally average songs and a couple really good ones closer to home...even if Liam Gallagher doesn't happen to front them.
Neither of them are the full package. That's for sure. But I got something from the Noel gig that I can't get at another gig. There is no gig out there that I can hear EOTR, Wonderwall, TIOBI, TDOYAM, BA, RM, SOTWB, WAL, Supersonic, HTWA, IIHAG, DLBIA, and Freaky Teeth at.
We'll see after the second BDI album. If they can make a great ones and have a set full of tunes that I'd love to hear live, I will be more than willing to travel to Vancouver or Toronto to see them. But I am not willing to sacrifice the time or money to see them if the songs aren't there just because the crowd or the band are energetic.
Right now I would assume they are definitely worth the price of admission...but they aren't worth my travel costs yet.
|
|
|
Post by youandmegirl on Dec 7, 2011 18:28:20 GMT -5
Personally, I find it harder to find a band that plays a set full of songs I love than I do finding a band playing a set of prodominantly fair-to-middling songs with energy. Frankly...there are a lot of those around. That is why I made the effort to travel to see Noel and I didn't make the effort to travel to see BDI. I can find energetic bands with generally average songs and a couple really good ones closer to home...even if Liam Gallagher doesn't happen to front them. Neither of them are the full package. That's for sure. But I got something from the Noel gig that I can't get at another gig. There is no gig out there that I can hear EOTR, Wonderwall, TIOBI, TDOYAM, BA, RM, SOTWB, WAL, Supersonic, HTWA, IIHAG, DLBIA, and Freaky Teeth at. We'll see after the second BDI album. If they can make a great ones and have a set full of tunes that I'd love to hear live, I will be more than willing to travel to Vancouver or Toronto to see them. But I am not willing to sacrifice the time or money to see them if the songs aren't there just because the crowd or the band are energetic. Basically you're looking for an Oasis-substitute. Cheers, nice to know, fair enough. And also others may think that the Beady Eye record is also the better record, yes? Of course, you didn't also look at it at that perspective, because otherwise it would make your socalled justification moot, wouldn't it? you scamp
|
|
|
Post by gdforever on Dec 7, 2011 19:01:55 GMT -5
Personally, I find it harder to find a band that plays a set full of songs I love than I do finding a band playing a set of prodominantly fair-to-middling songs with energy. Frankly...there are a lot of those around. That is why I made the effort to travel to see Noel and I didn't make the effort to travel to see BDI. I can find energetic bands with generally average songs and a couple really good ones closer to home...even if Liam Gallagher doesn't happen to front them. Neither of them are the full package. That's for sure. But I got something from the Noel gig that I can't get at another gig. There is no gig out there that I can hear EOTR, Wonderwall, TIOBI, TDOYAM, BA, RM, SOTWB, WAL, Supersonic, HTWA, IIHAG, DLBIA, and Freaky Teeth at. We'll see after the second BDI album. If they can make a great ones and have a set full of tunes that I'd love to hear live, I will be more than willing to travel to Vancouver or Toronto to see them. But I am not willing to sacrifice the time or money to see them if the songs aren't there just because the crowd or the band are energetic. Basically you're looking for an Oasis-substitute. Cheers, nice to know, fair enough. And also others may think that the Beady Eye record is also the better record, yes? Of course, you didn't also look at it at that perspective, because otherwise it would make your socalled justification moot, wouldn't it? you scamp Who ever said I am looking for an Oasis substitute? I named more HFB songs than Oasis songs as ones that were particular reasons I enjoyed the show. I'd have gone for just the HFB songs too if he had put a few more of the extra tracks and b-sides. I would have been even happier with the show if he had played AOTR, ASGOG, or LTLSALOM instead of MF, IGTBF, and LBL. I do believe that I always used the personal pronoun...indicating that I wasn't making a societal comment...but expressing a personal opinion. Never said anyone else had to think the same as me. Didn't the mods say they were going to crack down on the duplicate accounts over a week ago? What a joke.
|
|
|
Post by youandmegirl on Dec 7, 2011 19:42:03 GMT -5
Basically you're looking for an Oasis-substitute. Cheers, nice to know, fair enough. And also others may think that the Beady Eye record is also the better record, yes? Of course, you didn't also look at it at that perspective, because otherwise it would make your socalled justification moot, wouldn't it? you scamp Who ever said I am looking for an Oasis substitute? I named more HFB songs than Oasis songs as ones that were particular reasons I enjoyed the show. I'd have gone for just the HFB songs too if he had put a few more of the extra tracks and b-sides. I would have been even happier with the show if he had played AOTR, ASGOG, or LTLSALOM instead of MF, IGTBF, and LBL. I do believe that I always used the personal pronoun...indicating that I wasn't making a societal comment...but expressing a personal opinion. Never said anyone else had to think the same as me. Didn't the mods say they were going to crack down on the duplicate accounts over a week ago? What a joke. Ahh, I see, okay: it's not really the point that you add more non-Oasis songs into the preference than, say, Oasis songs, but you made it a point to add the Oasis songs within that mix (e.g. "There is no gig out there that I can hear...Wonderwall...Supersonic...DLBIA [at the moment, like]" etc etc. You see, given the ambient volume of your own live4ever.proboards.com life's noise of spin and rhetoric and context that I know I'm not alone in finding you more than dependable on the subjective realm. So as far as the "personal pronoun" as modifier is concerned, being "personal" is not as really front-loaded as you would suggest, the one that I expect for those--who prefer a Beady Eye gig over a Noel Gallagher's Flying Birds--winces at and would prefer not to see you utter or rather, suggest even in the most reassuring context, since the rhetoric of such reassurances can be self-nullifying, like how you asserted that "There is no gig out there that I can hear EOTR, Wonderwall, TIOBI, TDOYAM, BA, RM, SOTWB, WAL, Supersonic, HTWA, IIHAG, DLBIA, and Freaky Teeth at.", which is quite redundant, considering all the Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds songs, for what I know, have only been performed by the Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds in a front of a paying audience, in front of proper fans of said band, at a proper venue no less. As in, say, running a classified ad for oneself as a caretaker of children and putting "DON'T WORRY -- NOT A PEDOPHILE!" at the bottom of the ad. You see, my general point is I suspect that part of why the "personal" is so loaded and dicey a position in regards to exclusivity here is that it is so much-invoked here that it is a form of a dismissal of the other side without you being aware of it, or at least willing to admit-- that YOU lack self-awareness, even though you had used the "personal" as a crux, of just how much subcontracting and outsourcing you really do. Case in point: you have resort to slandering me of being duplicitous, of course such self-assuredness is as false and hasty as your determined transparency.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 7, 2011 21:32:31 GMT -5
I'm just wondering...why were you at a NGHFB gig if all you want is *rock*.It's just a grumpy old man playing his old and new materials.
I find it a bit ridiculous to argue about whose gig is better since their styles are completely different.It's undisputable that Noel's voice is not *rock* at all. If a gig has to be *rock* to be good for you than I highly suggest that don't waste your time and $$ on NGHFB gigs because you won't be satisfied.
And I have to disagree with those who say the highlights of NGHFB gigs are Oasis tunes, the sales have proved that people are interested in his new materials, not only the old ones, there are singalongs with the news songs aswell. There are youtube clips which can prove it.
As for myself...the only Oasis tracks I don't skip when listening to NGHFB bootlegs are LBL and DLBIA. I don't particularly want anything nostalgic.
(How much are you willing to pay for a NGHFB/BDI gig btw? When BDI toured where I live the tickets cost 120USD from the first row to the last. I'm not an expert,but it's that a bit too much?)
|
|
|
Post by thuperthonic on Dec 7, 2011 22:07:15 GMT -5
Who ever said I am looking for an Oasis substitute? I named more HFB songs than Oasis songs as ones that were particular reasons I enjoyed the show. I'd have gone for just the HFB songs too if he had put a few more of the extra tracks and b-sides. I would have been even happier with the show if he had played AOTR, ASGOG, or LTLSALOM instead of MF, IGTBF, and LBL. I do believe that I always used the personal pronoun...indicating that I wasn't making a societal comment...but expressing a personal opinion. Never said anyone else had to think the same as me. Didn't the mods say they were going to crack down on the duplicate accounts over a week ago? What a joke. Ahh, I see, okay: it's not really the point that you add more non-Oasis songs into the preference than, say, Oasis songs, but you made it a point to add the Oasis songs within that mix (e.g. "There is no gig out there that I can hear...Wonderwall...Supersonic...DLBIA [at the moment, like]" etc etc. You see, given the ambient volume of your own live4ever.proboards.com life's noise of spin and rhetoric and context that I know I'm not alone in finding you more than dependable on the subjective realm. So as far as the "personal pronoun" as modifier is concerned, being "personal" is not as really front-loaded as you would suggest, the one that I expect for those--who prefer a Beady Eye gig over a Noel Gallagher's Flying Birds--winces at and would prefer not to see you utter or rather, suggest even in the most reassuring context, since the rhetoric of such reassurances can be self-nullifying, like how you asserted that "There is no gig out there that I can hear EOTR, Wonderwall, TIOBI, TDOYAM, BA, RM, SOTWB, WAL, Supersonic, HTWA, IIHAG, DLBIA, and Freaky Teeth at.", which is quite redundant, considering all the Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds songs, for what I know, have only been performed by the Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds in a front of a paying audience, in front of proper fans of said band, at a proper venue no less. As in, say, running a classified ad for oneself as a caretaker of children and putting "DON'T WORRY -- NOT A PEDOPHILE!" at the bottom of the ad. You see, my general point is I suspect that part of why the "personal" is so loaded and dicey a position in regards to exclusivity here is that it is so much-invoked here that it is a form of a dismissal of the other side without you being aware of it, or at least willing to admit-- that YOU lack self-awareness, even though you had used the "personal" as a crux, of just how much subcontracting and outsourcing you really do. Case in point: you have resort to slandering me of being duplicitous, of course such self-assuredness is as false and hasty as your determined transparency. Dude, we're just a bunch of fans here. Not friends. We all have our preferences within our fandom, and we're here to express them. That is not a bad thing. Obviously, there isn't enough of an outlet for us to express them in the rest of our daily lives so we come here and talk about the band we loved so fucking much it made us want to talk about them every day, and sometimes we don't care what anyone else thinks. It's ok. It's passion. Your mind, brilliant as it may be, might benefit from being put to better use.
|
|
|
Post by gdforever on Dec 7, 2011 22:19:31 GMT -5
Who ever said I am looking for an Oasis substitute? I named more HFB songs than Oasis songs as ones that were particular reasons I enjoyed the show. I'd have gone for just the HFB songs too if he had put a few more of the extra tracks and b-sides. I would have been even happier with the show if he had played AOTR, ASGOG, or LTLSALOM instead of MF, IGTBF, and LBL. I do believe that I always used the personal pronoun...indicating that I wasn't making a societal comment...but expressing a personal opinion. Never said anyone else had to think the same as me. Didn't the mods say they were going to crack down on the duplicate accounts over a week ago? What a joke. Ahh, I see, okay: it's not really the point that you add more non-Oasis songs into the preference than, say, Oasis songs, but you made it a point to add the Oasis songs within that mix (e.g. "There is no gig out there that I can hear...Wonderwall...Supersonic...DLBIA [at the moment, like]" etc etc. You see, given the ambient volume of your own live4ever.proboards.com life's noise of spin and rhetoric and context that I know I'm not alone in finding you more than dependable on the subjective realm. So as far as the "personal pronoun" as modifier is concerned, being "personal" is not as really front-loaded as you would suggest, the one that I expect for those--who prefer a Beady Eye gig over a Noel Gallagher's Flying Birds--winces at and would prefer not to see you utter or rather, suggest even in the most reassuring context, since the rhetoric of such reassurances can be self-nullifying, like how you asserted that "There is no gig out there that I can hear EOTR, Wonderwall, TIOBI, TDOYAM, BA, RM, SOTWB, WAL, Supersonic, HTWA, IIHAG, DLBIA, and Freaky Teeth at.", which is quite redundant, considering all the Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds songs, for what I know, have only been performed by the Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds in a front of a paying audience, in front of proper fans of said band, at a proper venue no less. As in, say, running a classified ad for oneself as a caretaker of children and putting "DON'T WORRY -- NOT A PEDOPHILE!" at the bottom of the ad. You see, my general point is I suspect that part of why the "personal" is so loaded and dicey a position in regards to exclusivity here is that it is so much-invoked here that it is a form of a dismissal of the other side without you being aware of it, or at least willing to admit-- that YOU lack self-awareness, even though you had used the "personal" as a crux, of just how much subcontracting and outsourcing you really do. Case in point: you have resort to slandering me of being duplicitous, of course such self-assuredness is as false and hasty as your determined transparency. I think you've lost the plot, man. Point being made was that I went for the music and that is the only gig around playing that music. (NG written tunes past and present) Point being I can find other gigs with as much energy as a BDI gig if what I want is an energetic band. But no other show is going to give me songs I love as much as those that I mentioned. It'd help if you didn't have the brain of a precocious 6 year old.
|
|
|
Post by ctmazin on Dec 7, 2011 22:38:46 GMT -5
Ahh, I see, okay: it's not really the point that you add more non-Oasis songs into the preference than, say, Oasis songs, but you made it a point to add the Oasis songs within that mix (e.g. "There is no gig out there that I can hear...Wonderwall...Supersonic...DLBIA [at the moment, like]" etc etc. You see, given the ambient volume of your own live4ever.proboards.com life's noise of spin and rhetoric and context that I know I'm not alone in finding you more than dependable on the subjective realm. So as far as the "personal pronoun" as modifier is concerned, being "personal" is not as really front-loaded as you would suggest, the one that I expect for those--who prefer a Beady Eye gig over a Noel Gallagher's Flying Birds--winces at and would prefer not to see you utter or rather, suggest even in the most reassuring context, since the rhetoric of such reassurances can be self-nullifying, like how you asserted that "There is no gig out there that I can hear EOTR, Wonderwall, TIOBI, TDOYAM, BA, RM, SOTWB, WAL, Supersonic, HTWA, IIHAG, DLBIA, and Freaky Teeth at.", which is quite redundant, considering all the Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds songs, for what I know, have only been performed by the Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds in a front of a paying audience, in front of proper fans of said band, at a proper venue no less. As in, say, running a classified ad for oneself as a caretaker of children and putting "DON'T WORRY -- NOT A PEDOPHILE!" at the bottom of the ad. You see, my general point is I suspect that part of why the "personal" is so loaded and dicey a position in regards to exclusivity here is that it is so much-invoked here that it is a form of a dismissal of the other side without you being aware of it, or at least willing to admit-- that YOU lack self-awareness, even though you had used the "personal" as a crux, of just how much subcontracting and outsourcing you really do. Case in point: you have resort to slandering me of being duplicitous, of course such self-assuredness is as false and hasty as your determined transparency. Dude, we're just a bunch of fans here. Not friends. We all have our preferences within our fandom, and we're here to express them. That is not a bad thing. Obviously, there isn't enough of an outlet for us to express them in the rest of our daily lives so we come here and talk about the band we loved so fucking much it made us want to talk about them every day, and sometimes we don't care what anyone else thinks. It's ok. It's passion. K+
|
|
|
Post by Silence Dogood on Dec 7, 2011 23:25:43 GMT -5
I like rock n roll, not folksy pop, therefore i think BDI's album is better than Noel's. Having said that, it can't be denied that Noel's album has some very good tunes and one great tune(EOTR). The thing, like a lot of people have pointed out, is that he can't deliver live(on some of those songs). i believe there's a video out there on youtube where Noel asks someone what's better, rock or jazz ? to which Noel replies, Rock duh, jazz isn't bad but the best jazz music can never touch the best rockNroll song.
|
|
|
Post by howsoonisnow on Dec 8, 2011 5:02:39 GMT -5
For those saying it's stupid to hope Noel would be rock. Well sorry, I know Noel's show aren't supposed to be rock but I'm not glad about it. I don't ask him to do "rock n roll star", I just ask him to put a little bit of energy and to sing louder, it's really hard to hear him. I don't think it's that much to ask.
I mean Noel isn't supposed to be rock at all? My mistake, I thought he was Oasis guitarist and songwritter for 18 years, I though he wrote DM and I though he was part of a great rockn roll show with Oasis. So I don't see why everyone is so glad his gigs are so calm now. In Oasis gigs, I like the moments when Noel was singing, it cooled off after the madness of the first songs, it was a different vibe. But now, it's just this different vibe, it 's really good, but it doesn't touch the sky like it used to.
And for the last time, Noel hasn't a great stage presence as a singer whereas he had as a guitarist and hasn't a strong voice at all. He can't sing any of the high notes on TDOYAM or WAL. He can't deliver all his solo material even if the songs are great. He's fine on IIAG but the drumer is awfull.
|
|
|
Post by howsoonisnow on Dec 8, 2011 5:09:37 GMT -5
Neither of them are the full package. That's for sure. But I got something from the Noel gig that I can't get at another gig. There is no gig out there that I can hear EOTR, Wonderwall, TIOBI, TDOYAM, BA, RM, SOTWB, WAL, Supersonic, HTWA, IIHAG, DLBIA, and Freaky Teeth at. Personnally, I really didn't need to hear Supersonic the way Noel plays it, it's nice but it's just nostalgia, the version itself has nothing special. Even if Noel has the song, can you really tell me his deliver can compare to an Oasis gig ? and I'm not just talking about his voice, I'm talking about the full band.
|
|
|
Post by tomlivesforever on Dec 8, 2011 5:34:27 GMT -5
Personally, I find it harder to find a band that plays a set full of songs I love than I do finding a band playing a set of prodominantly fair-to-middling songs with energy. Frankly...there are a lot of those around. That is why I made the effort to travel to see Noel and I didn't make the effort to travel to see BDI. I can find energetic bands with generally average songs and a couple really good ones closer to home...even if Liam Gallagher doesn't happen to front them. Neither of them are the full package. That's for sure. But I got something from the Noel gig that I can't get at another gig. There is no gig out there that I can hear EOTR, Wonderwall, TIOBI, TDOYAM, BA, RM, SOTWB, WAL, Supersonic, HTWA, IIHAG, DLBIA, and Freaky Teeth at. We'll see after the second BDI album. If they can make a great ones and have a set full of tunes that I'd love to hear live, I will be more than willing to travel to Vancouver or Toronto to see them. But I am not willing to sacrifice the time or money to see them if the songs aren't there just because the crowd or the band are energetic. Right now I would assume they are definitely worth the price of admission...but they aren't worth my travel costs yet. Its just a question of taste. I really haven't seriously considered going to see Noel at any point. His show's are a mid-tempo bonanza, at least at a BDI gig there is far more variation of songs but I don't really know why people are making this a 'rock' issue. BDI have slower songs its just their show is a lot more cleverly sequenced for me. God forbid that Noel should throw in a 'Step Out' or something but instead you get an acoustic Supersonic thats strips the heart out of everything that was good about it in the first place. I just think Noel has become the tepid, self-satisfied, 'elder statesman of rock' the papers have been telling him he is for the last 10 years.
|
|