|
|
Post by thomuk2006 on Jul 27, 2011 5:26:17 GMT -5
1. The single hasn't been uploaded to Spotify
2. pitchfork.com haven't had a news story relating to the new single, never mind a review, I would love to see what those pretentious pricks think, they can't deny it's a great pop song
Discuss....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 27, 2011 5:37:44 GMT -5
Pitchfork are a disgrace
|
|
|
|
Post by Iliad ♣ on Jul 27, 2011 5:40:01 GMT -5
no review at all is better than getting slaughtered by pitchfork
|
|
|
|
Post by definitivt on Jul 27, 2011 5:58:18 GMT -5
1) The single will probably be uploaded at the release date.
2) It would be very satisfying if Pitchfork could spare us from their shitty and pretentious reviews. It won't matter how great the record or the single is, they will never ever rate it higher than 6.0.
|
|
|
|
Post by Teotihuacan on Jul 27, 2011 6:11:25 GMT -5
Exactly, you can predict to a tee the shit Dickfork will write, it'll predictably parrot what the anti Noel faction of the press and hipsters on NME website comments will say - sounds just like TIOBI, weedy voice, song needs Liam. "I'm hipper than thou and only listen to Animal Collective." Oasis only had two good albums then went to shit. It sounds nothing like The Beatles, but it wouldn't surprise me if some lazy critic says it anyway for old time's sake. |
|
face
Madferrit Fan
Posts: 90
|
Post by face on Jul 27, 2011 6:25:25 GMT -5
they can't deny it's a great pop song They should be able to, since it isn't. |
|
CF83
Oasis Roadie
Posts: 400
|
Post by CF83 on Jul 27, 2011 8:03:24 GMT -5
Just read their 'Top 100 Albums of the 90s'
Oasis not mentioned once, don't think I've ever seen that. Is this website American? A lot of the writing is really pretentious.
|
|
|
|
Post by BlueJay on Jul 27, 2011 9:21:08 GMT -5
Pitchfork aren't a disgrace, they just aren't always right and sometimes let their negative pre-conceptions or what people expect them to think get in the way of actually reviewing the music. Their review of The Masterplan was a good example of this, even they'd be ashamed of such a pathetic review now.
But they do know good music and usually provide good points to base their arguments upon. I discovered Arcade Fire, Tame Impala and Grizzly Bear becasue of Pitchfork. And for that I thank them.
|
|
putmeinmyplace89
Oasis Roadie
I live my life for the stars that shine
Posts: 208
|
Post by putmeinmyplace89 on Jul 27, 2011 9:58:48 GMT -5
Pitchfork is the problem with music today... Pitchfork is fox news, Noely G is Barack Obama. He could pretend he's a member of the kkk and fox news still will crucify him... Noel could release a shit album called King of Lambs (pitchforks definition of quality) and noel will get a 4.5
|
|
|
|
Post by Lennon2217 on Jul 27, 2011 10:06:11 GMT -5
Oasis might not have made Pitchfork's top 100 albums of the 90s (A disgrace by the way) but they did manage to do something no one else did in their top 200 songs of the 90s. Noel Gallagher is the only songwriter to have two songs listed! Oasis went in at #50 for 'Live Forever' and 'Setting Sun' went in at #43. Nobody else wrote two songs listed in that top 200. Only Noel Gallagher. pitchfork.com/features/staff-lists/7854-the-top-200-tracks-of-the-1990s-200-151/Also listed were: #145 - Ride 'Vapour Trail' #111 - La's 'There She Goes (w/Chris) So it's nice to see some elements of Oasis get recognized. |
|
|
|
Post by deasy on Jul 27, 2011 10:11:30 GMT -5
Pitchfork loved Ride and Andy Bell
|
|
|
|
Post by Lennon2217 on Jul 27, 2011 10:49:27 GMT -5
Pitchfork killed Noel for that Jay-Z/Glastonbury comment during the summer of 2008. I did not see Pitchfork post the most recent news regarding that controversy. Michael Eavis announced two weeks ago that Saturday night 2008 did not sell out, the festival almost went under because of it and so on. "We sell out only because we get huge headliners. In the year Jay-Z played we nearly went bankrupt, Isn't that exactly the reason Noel stated as why it didn't sell out for the first time? Hip Hop didn't catch on. The media ripped him apart but at the end of the day Noel was proven right. Pitchfork has not mentioned this once. Bastards. www.nme.com/news/glastonbury/57914 |
|
|
|
Post by caats19 on Jul 27, 2011 11:27:55 GMT -5
i bet they'd review the album. not surprise on nothing on the single to me
|
|
|
|
Post by matt on Jul 27, 2011 11:29:57 GMT -5
Pitchfork do write decent articles, but at the end of the day, they are all pretentious wannabe hipsters. Their views on music are incredibly narrow minded and the whole anti-Oasis thing is quite immature and pathetic to be honest.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lennon2217 on Jul 27, 2011 11:29:58 GMT -5
Pitchfork still has not reviewed Beady Eye yet. I am waiting to see what they write. I do not expect it to be kind.  |
|
|
|
Post by Headmaster on Jul 27, 2011 12:26:20 GMT -5
Yeah, why Pitchfuckers didn't write a review for DGSS yet?
|
|
|
|
Post by shoes222 on Jul 27, 2011 12:33:57 GMT -5
You know they'd just slate it off, what's the point?
|
|
|
|
Post by deasy on Jul 27, 2011 12:35:24 GMT -5
They would give it a negative mark.
They didn't review it though because they only review things that would be of interest to its readers.
|
|
|
|
Post by manualex on Jul 27, 2011 12:39:13 GMT -5
They would give it a negative mark. They didn't review it though because they only review things that would be of interest to its readers. Yeah, they review albums with names like "Im gay" and "Gold Rings and Fur Pelts" but not DGSS |
|
|
|
Post by spaneli on Jul 27, 2011 12:39:56 GMT -5
Just read their 'Top 100 Albums of the 90s' Oasis not mentioned once, don't think I've ever seen that. Is this website American? A lot of the writing is really pretentious. Yes. It is American. It's Chicago based. |
|
CF83
Oasis Roadie
Posts: 400
|
Post by CF83 on Jul 27, 2011 13:24:49 GMT -5
Just read their 'Top 100 Albums of the 90s' Oasis not mentioned once, don't think I've ever seen that. Is this website American? A lot of the writing is really pretentious. Yes. It is American. It's Chicago based. Hmm makes sense. I just read the Masterplan review. "This previously- ignored garbage gets scraped from the bottom of some dumpster behind Epic records, and packaged as newly- discovered gleaming treasures" Clueless fuckers. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 27, 2011 14:38:12 GMT -5
these people gave Heathen Chemistry 1.2/10. now although im not the albums biggest fan its better than that....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 27, 2011 15:00:58 GMT -5
Pitchfork do write decent articles, but at the end of the day, they are all pretentious wannabe hipsters. Their views on music are incredibly narrow minded and the whole anti-Oasis thing is quite immature and pathetic to be honest. Just because they don't like Oasis doesn't make their view on music incredibly narrow. Considering most people's taste here on this forum consist of Oasis, Kasabian, and Beady Eye I'd say the majority of these forums have more narrow taste in music. The way they slate Oasis is the same way the majority of this forum slate U2 or Radiohead. Say what you will about Pitchfork, but they do a lot of good in spreading the news about great new music. People that give them shit for reviews written ten years ago (ie: The Masterplan or Kid A) come off as ignorant as they proclaim Pitchfork writers to be. |
|
face
Madferrit Fan
Posts: 90
|
Post by face on Jul 27, 2011 15:05:24 GMT -5
Say what you will about Pitchfork, but they do a lot of good in spreading the news about great new music. No, they don't. |
|
spark
Oasis Roadie
I can do that, I can do that well easy!
Posts: 307
|
Post by spark on Jul 27, 2011 15:19:50 GMT -5
Pitchfork do write decent articles, but at the end of the day, they are all pretentious wannabe hipsters. Their views on music are incredibly narrow minded and the whole anti-Oasis thing is quite immature and pathetic to be honest. Just because they don't like Oasis doesn't make their view on music incredibly narrow. Considering most people's taste here on this forum consist of Oasis, Kasabian, and Beady Eye I'd say the majority of these forums have more narrow taste in music. The way they slate Oasis is the same way the majority of this forum slate U2 or Radiohead. Say what you will about Pitchfork, but they do a lot of good in spreading the news about great new music. People that give them shit for reviews written ten years ago (ie: The Masterplan or Kid A) come off as ignorant as they proclaim Pitchfork writers to be. Well said TheImportance! That's a nice mirror your holding there  |
|
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5