|
Post by shedboy on Feb 16, 2011 8:13:46 GMT -5
There's already a thread on this guys.
|
|
|
Post by andymorris on Feb 16, 2011 8:43:07 GMT -5
His songs are indeed underdevelopped. Sometimes it works, sometimes it dont. While i still think Morning Son should have a chorus, they managed to make it sound quite good. On the other hand, Wigwam is a miss. Boring verses, boring production and a closing part that is just way too long.
Liam's obviously got a talent for melody, but he needs to work a bit more on it. for the next album, he has to come up with strucured songs. He wont get away with it all the time.
|
|
|
Post by wonderplan on Feb 16, 2011 9:03:30 GMT -5
Hmm I get what you all are saying. i'm just not a firm believer in that you have to stick to a universal songwriting structure standard to create something enjoyable. As mentioned there's many more elements than song structure to consider. I think if you just listen to it for what it is instead of picking it apart you'll see where the quote "it's not rocket science, it's rock n' roll" came from
|
|
|
Post by andymorris on Feb 16, 2011 9:32:37 GMT -5
structure dont matter, that's for sure, but Liam's song always lack something. Well except his songs on HC which are perfect.
|
|
|
Post by wonderplan on Feb 16, 2011 9:36:26 GMT -5
structure dont matter, that's for sure, but Liam's song always lack something. Well except his songs on HC which are perfect. possibly the only thing close to perfect on HC lol
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2011 9:45:17 GMT -5
For me music is a bit more simple. If I can turn it on and enjoy it, then bring it on. That is the charm of Oasis/BDI. "you don't need a logarithm table to understand their music". Even Noel doesn't write sophisticated music, which is why so many people adore his songs. Why would we expect Liam to be anything different?
I think everyone, me included, confuses a well written song with a well embellished one. The two things are mutually exclusive. You don't need both to have a good song. However, it always helps.
|
|
|
Post by wonderplan on Feb 16, 2011 9:46:47 GMT -5
For me music is a bit more simple. If I can turn it on and enjoy it, then bring it on. That is the charm of Oasis/BDI. "you don't need a logarithm table to understand their music". Even Noel doesn't write sophisticated music, which is why so many people adore his songs. Why would we expect Liam to be anything different? I think everyone, me included, confuses a well written song with a well embellished one. The two things are mutually exclusive. You don't need both to have a good song. However, it always helps. THIS!
|
|
|
Post by King Blougaredoc on Feb 16, 2011 9:51:30 GMT -5
Structure is an essential part of the most basic rock and roll. Not intelectual structure, but emotional. If Liam understand this his songs will get more consistent
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Monobrow on Feb 16, 2011 10:07:07 GMT -5
Here's how I'd describe many of Liam's songs - like A Day In The Life but without McCartney's part. All good, melody nicely sung, good production - the McCartney's bit completes the song. That's what I'm on about.
|
|
|
Post by andymorris on Feb 16, 2011 10:12:51 GMT -5
For me music is a bit more simple. If I can turn it on and enjoy it, then bring it on. That is the charm of Oasis/BDI. "you don't need a logarithm table to understand their music". Even Noel doesn't write sophisticated music, which is why so many people adore his songs. Why would we expect Liam to be anything different? I think everyone, me included, confuses a well written song with a well embellished one. The two things are mutually exclusive. You don't need both to have a good song. However, it always helps. THIS! I think we agree. i hate when people say "ok this is shit it's just 3 chords", i dont care about that, as long as the songs sounds good. But that isnt the case on, say, Wigwam. It's clearly not good enough, forcé.
|
|
|
Post by lastfanstanding on Feb 16, 2011 10:23:40 GMT -5
and all the la la la's and na na na's need to be put away.
Like both Liam and Noel said in the past that Liam had loads of songs but they where not finished. His songs sound like he didnt or couldnt write anymore lyrics and just had to keep repeating the same stuff over and over and..
I don't mind a 6 minute song with a great outro, but Liam seems to be using them as a security blanket more often than I want him too.
He maybe should have made a bunch of 3 minute songs on DGSS instead of what we got.
Who knows, maybe Gem influenced him more than we know on these decisions.
|
|
|
Post by alwaysnow on Feb 16, 2011 10:35:11 GMT -5
Ignorance is bliss.
I don't know anything about writing songs, nor song structure.
Probably because I just listen to Liam's songs is why I enjoy them so much, I just get carried away and enjoy the music. I'm not waiting for a bridge, another verse, nor anything, I'm just listening to the music.
Just to make it clear, I'm not dissing anyone who does analyze song structure, it's just that I don't do it, and that's probably why I like them more and don't see the technical flaws.
|
|
|
Post by BEng on Feb 16, 2011 10:48:37 GMT -5
I can understand what people are saying here. But many people forget how we were all thinking 1 year ago. Why on earth should we compare Liam with his brother or even sir Mccartney? This album is a lot better than everyone expected, I think few people 1 year ago thought the album would be as good as it is now. Is it an excuse to overpraise the album? No, of course not.
But I seriously believe the album, even disregarding the initial expectations, is very good. Of course it's not a classic, but it's a bloody pleasure listening to.
On first listen I was slightly disappointed with Wigwam & The Morning Son, even though I really liked them, but I also thought those 2 songs, especially The Morning Son had the potential of being a real classic. I was frustrated because Liam kept repeating the same things and I was expecting it to go somewhere. Now I've thrown away those frustrations and just enjoy it for what it is. I don't mind anymore that it doesn't go anywhere, because it's an amazing trip. The ending of The Morning Son is almost orgasmic. Same goes for Wigwam (even though I think TMS is slightly better)
I agree that the reason I love those 2 songs are 50% the amazing production and Chris' drumming, but what does that matter? Just stop thinking how much better it could've been, and realize it also could've been much, much worser. Just enjoy it for what it is, a very decent debut album.
|
|
|
Post by spyrosfab4 on Feb 16, 2011 11:07:55 GMT -5
Here's how I'd describe many of Liam's songs - like A Day In The Life but without McCartney's part. All good, melody nicely sung, good production - the McCartney's bit completes the song. That's what I'm on about. Did you just compared ADITL with liam's songs? ?? Mccartney's section doesn't have the FANTASTIC melody of lennon's section.If liam ever writes ANYTHING EVEN APPROACHING lennon's melody on that song.........noel should quit writing songs.....
|
|
|
Post by cloudburster on Feb 16, 2011 11:07:56 GMT -5
What's all this "you have to have a complex structure to make an enjoyable song" malarky about? What's wrong with a simple catchy melody that lasts 3 minutes? That's what rock n roll was built on, that's the what the Beatles did, and Liam is pretty much the last person in the music industry (including Noel, Andy and Gem) who is still doing it, yet he gets slagged for it? IMO Liam has written the best songs on all of the last 3 Oasis songs (Songbird, BOADC, Love Like A Bomb, The meaning Of Soul (yes I love this song) I'm Outta Time) and there is nothing wrong with a catchy 3 minute pop tune to lighten the mood I agree he shouldn't try and drag the songs out though like with The Morning Son. I think that would have been great as a 3 minute acoustic ditty at the end of the album to wind things down. EDIT: I may change by choice to Bag It Up as the best song on DOYS
|
|
|
Post by masterplan2011 on Feb 16, 2011 11:42:39 GMT -5
Wigwam The chips are down, you’re in the game But win or lose you feel the same Another bottle in the hand You’re sick of life and its demands
You're taking off in the night You're coming in when it's light You make it up to the wife You say you're wrong when it's right
Sha la la la la La la la la la Sha la la la la La la la la la
I don't think "la la la's" have ever been put to better use. I suppose its the way you interpret a song but I think Liam is just saying these are the little things that have you get through in life and the "la, la la's" wonderfully say life keeps going on For me, Liam's songwriting is really good but not in Noel's league but you have to remember although they are different personalities they are brothers after all, so its not a big a surprise that Liam can write good songs as well.
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Feb 16, 2011 11:54:33 GMT -5
I dunno. To me, Morning Son is a great album closer. It just goes round and round and round building a nice groove and swell of tension before it releases at the end. Very satisfying. This. A thousand times this. I know Liam repeats his lyrics as TMS continues, but when he does with the added guitars and instruments past the 2min mark, the song just swells and soars. It's the best part of the song for me, and it's the perfect closer. Oasis struggled with closing their albums recently (SO was boring dross, LTBL never realized its potential, BM is just dirge....). TMS is one of Liam's finest songs to date. Liam does need to develop more - his songs at times do come across as a bit incomplete, but that's not as obvious on DGSS. Although, while I do like Wigwam, I think he could have made the outro even more interesting and developed the song a bit better. But you know what? His songs on DGSS are a joy to listen to, and that's really all that matters at the end of the day.
|
|
|
Post by spyrosfab4 on Feb 16, 2011 11:57:36 GMT -5
What's wrong with a simple catchy melody that lasts 3 minutes? There is a difference between simple and simplistic.The beatles melodies were simple but GORGEOUS and complete. Liam has written 3 complete songs in my opinion. 1.Born on a Different Cloud 2.I'm Outta Time 3.Boy with the Blues His new songs are pretty enjoyable,but none of them are complete.
|
|
|
Post by SunshineLullaby on Feb 16, 2011 11:58:27 GMT -5
The problem in this thread is so many people are assuming that everyone's reacting the same way to each song. I have nothing against short, simple, songs. I have nothing against repeating lyrics. I have nothing against deviating from traditional song structure. And honestly, there's nothing "wrong" with DGSS. But the songs never get to that next level for me. The closest is Four Letter Word, but that's it.
I could write a 50-page paper on songwriting and structure and all that stuff with all that I've learned through listening and through writing hundreds of songs. But in the end what matters is what moves you. If this album (and Liam's songs on it) do that for you, then that's great. But it falls short of ever being great or even very good for me. It's solid. It's okay. But that's all (in my opinion).
And another thing, don't act like I'm just saying it doesn't stand up to the "classics" (whatever that means). Because I'm not saying that. I heard at least ten albums last year that blew me away and connected on that higher level. My favorite album of all time was released in 2008. Don't make excuses for BDI. If you think it stands up, fair enough. But don't say "Well, it's better than all that crap/rubbish they play on the radio". You're actually giving a very backhanded compliment. I don't think Liam, Andy, Gem, and Chris had a mission statement of "We're not going to settle for anything worse than Justin Bieber." So don't act like that's some sort of high praise, because it isn't.
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Monobrow on Feb 16, 2011 12:17:40 GMT -5
Mccartney's section doesn't have the FANTASTIC melody of lennon's section.If liam ever writes ANYTHING EVEN APPROACHING lennon's melody on that song.........noel should quit writing songs..... You're missing the point. I don't think McCartney's bit is "better" than Lennon's, the point is that it makes the song far better. If A Day In The Life was just Lennon's bits, it'd be a much weaker song, no matter how great the melody is. McCartney's bit is the little shift the song needed. Look, Tomorrow Never Knows was one of Lennon's best songs - it was one chord and one line of melody repeated for 3 minutes. But that was the exception, with Liam, it's the norm. And because it's the norm, it gets boring and annoying because it's no basic. It doesn't need massive, revolutionary changes, just little bits. The best songs are simple, not easy.
|
|
|
Post by The Morning Son on Feb 16, 2011 12:25:36 GMT -5
I think I have been slightly misunderstood. I totally agree that Liam's songs need that cutting edge to take it from a good song to a great song and that he doesnt relly understand structures of theory.
The two points I wanted to make are that I think he has got better. From Little James to now on this album having put out Wigwam, For Anyone & The Morning Son.
And that he has a great talent at writing almost these beautiful love songs, some of the sentiments in these songs are amazing and could be so much better with the right structure and that 'little cherry to top them off'
For me though, he nailed Wigwam. The words are beautiful, it has that little muddled bit and then blends into some dreamy ending. Thats what Liam does best, floaty ballads.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2011 12:25:43 GMT -5
Mccartney's section doesn't have the FANTASTIC melody of lennon's section.If liam ever writes ANYTHING EVEN APPROACHING lennon's melody on that song.........noel should quit writing songs..... You're missing the point. I don't think McCartney's bit is "better" than Lennon's, the point is that it makes the song far better. If A Day In The Life was just Lennon's bits, it'd be a much weaker song, no matter how great the melody is. Comparing the two is an awful comparison, imo. Macca's part was an entirely different song that they tossed in the middle there to break up the song. We are talking about a single song written by a single man, not two completely different tracks being spliced together to create something almost perfect. Thats more like Up In The Sky being tucked on the end of Round Are Way. Your comparison would be better thrown toward Let There Be Love, where Noel tweaked the song for years until he hit the middle part. I think the idea is brilliant and it makes that song, but I don't think that every song needs to be broken up in that way to complete it. TMS stands on it's own for me, and it ends the album well.
|
|
|
Post by spyrosfab4 on Feb 16, 2011 12:29:36 GMT -5
Mccartney's section doesn't have the FANTASTIC melody of lennon's section.If liam ever writes ANYTHING EVEN APPROACHING lennon's melody on that song.........noel should quit writing songs..... You're missing the point. I don't think McCartney's bit is "better" than Lennon's, the point is that it makes the song far better. If A Day In The Life was just Lennon's bits, it'd be a much weaker song, no matter how great the melody is. McCartney's bit is the little shift the song needed. I got it the first time friend.Of course it makes the song more complete,but the way you said it the first time,it was as though you meant that liam writes melodies as good as ADITL and they only need one more section to make them masterpieces.......
|
|
|
Post by supersonic8587 on Feb 16, 2011 12:29:47 GMT -5
Ignorance is bliss. I don't know anything about writing songs, nor song structure. Probably because I just listen to Liam's songs is why I enjoy them so much, I just get carried away and enjoy the music. I'm not waiting for a bridge, another verse, nor anything, I'm just listening to the music. Just to make it clear, I'm not dissing anyone who does analyze song structure, it's just that I don't do it, and that's probably why I like them more and don't see the technical flaws. I completely agree with this. I don't try and act like I'm a producer when I'm listening to music, trying to pick out what I would have or wouldn't have done or what could make the song better or worse, because there's nothing I can do about it anyway. And trying to strip Liam's songs down to the core and saying it's just the production that makes them good or just the extra guitar solo or drum outro is ludicrous. The fact is they are parts of the song and can't be taken away. You think Noel had horns in mind at the end of The Masterplan when he wrote it? Or do you think he included the amazing guitar solo in Champagne Supernova when he was first strumming it on his acoustic guitar? No. But these were added later and the songs are better for it. So just enjoy it.
|
|
|
Post by SunshineLullaby on Feb 16, 2011 13:50:52 GMT -5
I also should say I really like the songs for what they are. I do enjoy listening to the album, but for me it's just solid, nothing special.
|
|