|
Post by vespa on Jun 11, 2008 7:52:48 GMT -5
edith bowman will hav defo heard the album,shes mates of the wives an that an is a reliable source,with the sounds of it the album is gonna be a huge rockier record in the stlye of be here now but better,if it was shite shed say so,this will be the album to bring the boys back,an it not be too hard having heard coldplays effort,anyone calls liams vocals wants to hear chris martin,that album is bastard jokoe in parts
|
|
|
Post by Jazzvi on Jun 11, 2008 8:21:45 GMT -5
but weren't we expecting something colossal? "I’d like to make an absolutely fucking colossal album. You know? Like literally two orchestras, stuff like that" (Noel, NME Jan 4, 2007) How can an album with orchestras and "stuff like that" sound like the first time you heard rock'n'roll star or supersonic?
|
|
|
Post by Jonny on Jun 11, 2008 8:56:55 GMT -5
How can an album with orchestras and "stuff like that" sound like the first time you heard rock'n'roll star or supersonic? Perhaps the sheer impact and freshness of the style of the tracks? Or maybe the fantastic songwriting and musicianmanship of it? I don't know, but I think that there are high hopes about this, they haven't said a word which is probably intentional, then put out 3 bland, but good demo's to drip feed us little snippets of what could be. I for one reckon Stop The Clocks will definatley be a B-side if it's not on the album, further backed up the fact that it's meant to be "The Masterplan version 2". I think the singles they put out are based on singalong factor and catchiness, like Wonderwall is much easier to singalong to than The Masterplan.
|
|
|
Post by kenneth on Jun 11, 2008 11:20:37 GMT -5
How can an album with orchestras and "stuff like that" sound like the first time you heard rock'n'roll star or supersonic? She was actually referring to the first single when she said that. So that probably means that the first single will be a plain guitar track, like The Hindu Times and Lyla was, but more in the same style as Rock 'n' Roll Star and Supersonic.
|
|
|
Post by bwilder on Jun 11, 2008 14:27:06 GMT -5
Noel has said RM is on the album so...or am I making that up?
|
|
|
Post by Marcos on Jun 11, 2008 14:35:39 GMT -5
Noel has said RM is on the album so...or am I making that up? no you're not he has said it several times actually that the song is almost 10 minutes long, has 3 guitar solos and loads of choirs and orchestras.. can't remember where or when he said it, but he did!
|
|
|
Post by mercury3164 on Jun 11, 2008 14:42:07 GMT -5
noel has never ever said RM was on this album
|
|
|
Post by Mogly on Jun 11, 2008 14:45:57 GMT -5
Noel has said RM is on the album so...or am I making that up? no you're not he has said it several times actually that the song is almost 10 minutes long, has 3 guitar solos and loads of choirs and orchestras.. can't remember where or when he said it, but he did! Noel never said that... it's probably part of the confusion created by the tennis players and a couple of very old Noel quotes
|
|
|
Post by Marcos on Jun 11, 2008 15:00:14 GMT -5
no you're not he has said it several times actually that the song is almost 10 minutes long, has 3 guitar solos and loads of choirs and orchestras.. can't remember where or when he said it, but he did! Noel never said that... it's probably part of the confusion created by the tennis players and a couple of very old Noel quotes it isn't! i'm telling ya he said it by the end of last year the tennis players came along only this year
|
|
|
Post by mercury3164 on Jun 11, 2008 15:44:37 GMT -5
I repeat: noel has never ever said RM was on this album
|
|
|
Post by Marcos on Jun 11, 2008 16:13:18 GMT -5
ok then
|
|
|
Post by timekeeper on Jun 11, 2008 16:15:54 GMT -5
why don't we ask Jamie if it's on the album? he would know.
|
|
|
Post by supersonic1983 on Jun 11, 2008 16:28:10 GMT -5
Pah. live4evr is the only one who really knows what's on the album. He knew before Noel did.
|
|
|
Post by Marcos on Jun 11, 2008 16:29:29 GMT -5
if it isn't on the album i'll be very disappointed.. RM could be huge! i don't give a fuck about stop the clocks
|
|
|
Post by supersonic1983 on Jun 11, 2008 16:37:25 GMT -5
if it was shite shed say so Presenting Edith Bowman - the last bastion of honest music journalism.
|
|
|
Post by dearprudence on Jun 11, 2008 18:10:42 GMT -5
Hope neither of them are on the album, just in the first single
|
|
|
Post by gefe on Jun 11, 2008 19:42:12 GMT -5
3 tracks by liam? that really SUCKS, i guess that means 6 minutes of pure BS on the album
|
|
|
Post by Bloomfield on Jun 11, 2008 22:06:30 GMT -5
Exactly. I've said it before. Noel needs to stop being democratic and take the songwriting over again... and he also needs to let Liam sing the songs... 11 Noel songs and Liam singing 10 or 11 of them! It might be cool if he sang the chorus of Record Machine and nothing else.
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Jun 11, 2008 23:59:56 GMT -5
3 tracks by liam? thar really SUCKS, i guess that means 6 minutes of pure BS on the album I'll take another Song Bird, Love Like A Bomb, or Born on a Different Cloud, thank you very much
|
|
|
Post by King Blougaredoc on Jun 12, 2008 2:43:50 GMT -5
3 tracks by liam? thar really SUCKS, i guess that means 6 minutes of pure BS on the album I'll take another Song Bird, Love Like A Bomb, or Born on a Different Cloud, thank you very much Hero: sorry but you are not a hero, really
|
|
|
Post by LlAM on Jun 12, 2008 2:52:13 GMT -5
Exactly. I've said it before. Noel needs to stop being democratic and take the songwriting over again... and he also needs to let Liam sing the songs... 11 Noel songs and Liam singing 10 or 11 of them! It might be cool if he sang the chorus of Record Machine and nothing else. What if Liams 3 best songs are better than Noels 7th to 11th best songs? And you must be joking about RM chorus; it's clearly intended for Liam to sing. My opinion of course.
|
|
|
Post by themanwithnoname on Jun 12, 2008 2:55:11 GMT -5
if it was shite shed say so How do you work that one out? She's just been paid a wedge of cash to do all the publicity interviews with them, she's not exactly objective is she? Still, it has got my hopes up. Just a shame it's still a few months off.
|
|
|
Post by LlAM on Jun 12, 2008 3:56:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Shakermaker on Jun 12, 2008 5:38:13 GMT -5
You really are a fucking idiot. First off, i dont believe any of this shit until the boys themselves confirm it, but that does sound like a typical Oasis album title Secondly, are you seriously judging the quality of the album by the title? You really are daft. Who the fuck you talking to you silly vagina? Was it you that made up that stupid title hence the reason you got abusive? Its not hard to act hard on the internet mate so dont fucking bother giving it the charlie big bollocks because i will hunt you down & spoon out your eyes you no good vagina Hey guys, please grow up mate, have respect for someones optinion .. thats why we have a forum here ... we are all Oasis fans, and that's what binds us, please keep respecting other people opinion, and you'll recieve the same respect in return, thanks ...
|
|
|
Post by kenneth on Jun 12, 2008 6:03:34 GMT -5
Ha ha! I knew I read that somewhere before!
|
|