|
|
Post by jasonbourne on Jun 10, 2008 13:59:15 GMT -5
Well, once again I'm super excited.
I for one am glad STC and Record machine aren't on the album since those tracks didn't blow me away.
but hopefully the album does.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheEXPERIENCE on Jun 10, 2008 14:12:17 GMT -5
I'm shocked so many don't care if RM is on the record or not. That song blew me away. It's hands down one of the best songs Noel's written since BHN IMO. And with more production, who knows who good it can be?
|
|
|
|
Post by castlecraver on Jun 10, 2008 14:23:41 GMT -5
I'd prefer RM on the new album, but STC doesn't quite do it for me yet so I'm not as disappointed on that front. But the fact of the matter is, we've heard the leaked songs, and if whatever's on the album will be new -- we just get to enjoy more material that way.
And who knows what exactly they'll perform on tour.
|
|
|
|
Post by gefe on Jun 10, 2008 14:43:43 GMT -5
6 noel tracks ?? i thought they said 7 some weeks ago
|
|
|
|
Post by Cast on Jun 10, 2008 14:54:27 GMT -5
That album title doesn't sound to bad to me
|
|
|
|
Post by jludlow on Jun 10, 2008 15:19:59 GMT -5
am gutted if RM is not on there. I have been telling all and sundry how good this song is, and was really looking fwd to the new version Part of me hopes this is bullshit, but if this is Edith B in a mag i dont think it is. Stay tuned to Radio 1 guys for more info
|
|
|
|
Post by webm@ster on Jun 10, 2008 15:28:44 GMT -5
Jamie has revealed the new Oasis album title to be " Streets Ahead, Miles Behind".  |
|
|
|
Post by kenneth on Jun 10, 2008 15:37:37 GMT -5
She compared the first single too Supersonic and Rock'n'Roll Star? Should be brilliant then! I'm sooo looking forward to this album!!!!
And as for the supposed title, I swear, I've read that somewhere before. I think it was here, but I'm not sure.
|
|
|
|
Post by gefe on Jun 10, 2008 16:07:12 GMT -5
it was a bad idea to compare it with supersonic and rnrs, now everybody will be expecting something huge and possibly it wont come that way
|
|
|
|
Post by shades on Jun 10, 2008 16:11:31 GMT -5
"Streets ahead, miles behind" is fucking awful!!!!! Mind you if that is the new title, id be worried  You really are a fucking idiot. First off, i dont believe any of this shit until the boys themselves confirm it, but that does sound like a typical Oasis album title Secondly, are you seriously judging the quality of the album by the title? You really are daft. Who the fuck you talking to you silly vagina? Was it you that made up that stupid title hence the reason you got abusive? Its not hard to act hard on the internet mate so dont fucking bother giving it the charlie big bollocks because i will hunt you down & spoon out your eyes you no good vagina |
|
|
|
Post by Marcos on Jun 10, 2008 16:56:56 GMT -5
You really are a fucking idiot. First off, i dont believe any of this shit until the boys themselves confirm it, but that does sound like a typical Oasis album title Secondly, are you seriously judging the quality of the album by the title? You really are daft. Who the fuck you talking to you silly vagina? Was it you that made up that stupid title hence the reason you got abusive? Its not hard to act hard on the internet mate so dont fucking bother giving it the charlie big bollocks because i will hunt you down & spoon out your eyes you no good vagina i guess this guy wanna be Liam an internet Liam.. how pathetic |
|
|
|
Post by bwilder on Jun 10, 2008 17:17:35 GMT -5
I agree with theEXPERIENCE on RM. That song blew me away as well. With the right tweaks and production, that song could EASILY enter my top 10 Oasis songs.
|
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Jun 10, 2008 17:18:55 GMT -5
You really are a fucking idiot. First off, i dont believe any of this shit until the boys themselves confirm it, but that does sound like a typical Oasis album title Secondly, are you seriously judging the quality of the album by the title? You really are daft. Who the fuck you talking to you silly vagina? Was it you that made up that stupid title hence the reason you got abusive? Its not hard to act hard on the internet mate so dont fucking bother giving it the charlie big bollocks because i will hunt you down & spoon out your eyes you no good vagina You're the one judging an album by the quality of the title. How old are you? 7? |
|
|
|
Post by caro on Jun 10, 2008 17:44:02 GMT -5
Hum... Not being a mafia member or anoasis geek of some sort I'm just wondering about Jamie's reliability and about his possible sources....  |
|
|
|
Post by thedon on Jun 10, 2008 19:05:49 GMT -5
I'm sick of these silly oxymorons that Oasis insist on having as album titles. Why would they want 'Miles Behind' in their album title anyway? Bit self-deprecating isn't it?
Anyway, cannot wait for this.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2008 20:12:36 GMT -5
If RM isn't gonna be on the new album then why and the hell wasn't it on DBTT instead of Mucky Fuckin' Fingers?
|
|
|
|
Post by adamhannah on Jun 10, 2008 20:29:42 GMT -5
what the fuck is the oasis mafia forum by the way?
|
|
|
|
Post by 32shutout on Jun 10, 2008 20:31:17 GMT -5
If RM isn't gonna be on the new album then why and the hell wasn't it on DBTT instead of Mucky Fuckin' Fingers? Cos mucking fingers rocks! It should have replaced any one of Liam's songs, or ABWR |
|
|
|
Post by thedon on Jun 10, 2008 20:35:37 GMT -5
A Bell Will Ring was the best song on that album.
|
|
|
|
Post by kevin613 on Jun 10, 2008 21:22:03 GMT -5
I think that 'Streets Ahead, Miles Behind' is BS. When I was first introduced to the interweb...way back in '99... and SOTSOG was coming out...I was out on some Oasis forum and that was the rumored title to a song on THAT album. For some reason I remember that pretty clearly b/c at the time I thought...'that's a pretty cool title for a song'.
|
|
|
|
Post by niftium on Jun 10, 2008 21:40:28 GMT -5
A Bell Will Ring was the best song on that album. Word. No one's saying that reworked versions of RM or StC won't appear on the new album. We've only been promised that we won't see those exact same demos appear in their current form. In one way, I agree with castlecraver: if they don't show up, that just means more brand new material. On the other hand, I'm a snob: I would love to have a lossless version of RM. (I am refusing to listen to StC still, just in case it is reworked.) |
|
|
|
Post by afd2448 on Jun 10, 2008 21:54:57 GMT -5
yeah thats what i was thinking that it only said the versions that were released didnt make it on the album..doesnt mean that the newer versions didnt make it on..cos i remember earlier noel saying that atleast say these songs were on the album..maybe i am wrong tho
|
|
|
|
Post by The Boy Without the Blues on Jun 10, 2008 22:20:16 GMT -5
It's not about which song is better (RM and Mucky Fingers), it's about who fits best in the album... Record Machine it's more of a slow song with an epic feeling... LTBL feel that void in DBTT... if RM and STC were in the album it would be a more romantic, slowest album, which the band didn't want... Mucky Fingers it's not one of the best songs in the album, but it definitely helps to define the album
|
|
|
|
Post by Bloomfield on Jun 11, 2008 0:04:36 GMT -5
I know this post isn't about Mucky Fingers, but that song is amazing... only they put the demo on the record for some stupid reason and never bothered to record a real version. Have you heard it live? It rocks. That song is the only one on the record not produced by Dave Sardy and wasn't recorded for the record with the other songs. Can you imagine if the demo for Hindu Times, Go Let It Out or Stop Crying Your Heart Out were released on their respective albums? Have you heard those demos? They are dreadful. The same goes for Force Of Nature... Noel put the demo from the "Love, Honour & Obey" soundtrack on Heathen Chemistry (it was recorded a year before the HC sessions), and it sucks. A properly recorded version with Liam probably would've been amazing.
The demos for Stop The Clocks and Record Machine give us a feel for the quality of the songs, but right now they're boring compared to what they could, and hopefully will be.
|
|
|
|
Post by jasonbourne on Jun 11, 2008 0:26:09 GMT -5
yeah thats what i was thinking that it only said the versions that were released didnt make it on the album..doesnt mean that the newer versions didnt make it on..cos i remember earlier noel saying that atleast say these songs were on the album..maybe i am wrong tho Her quote is "Those tracks that were leaked aren't even on the album." Whether its bullshit or not, she is not talking about the demos. She's saying the actual songs aren't on the album. That's my take on it. |
|
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5