Jonathon Ross is a class interviewer and you're being very harsh there. And has it ever crossed your mind that some interviewers know the answers to the questions they're asking but ask them for the benefit of their viewers?

Nonsense. Ever watched Parkinson?

He does a little bit of research before his guests come on and he lets them do most of the talking, which makes sense seeing as people are wanting to hear what they have to say. His interviews are first class. Jonathon Woss spent more time trying to be funny than asking decent questions.

Even the Frank Skinner interview with Noel outclasses Woss' attempt last night.

Jonathan ross usually takes the piss out of his guests and i think noel finds it very hard to see the funny side of someone taking the piss in a friendly way. I think he decided before he went on he was gonna take the piss out of ross just as much as ross took the piss out of him just to give as good as he got.

There was a good bit in the interview, when he said "the last conversation me and liam had was a very in depth debate about cheese, and i no for a fact liam knows nothing about cheese" ;D

jonathan ross is a fucking class interviewer by the way. He's funny, who cares if he doesnt no much about the person he's interviewing, that makes it all the more funny. He's so much better then parkinson, who could interview the most interesting person in the world and it would still be boring.

i like ross on radio 2 on a saturday morning but i hate his chat show because he tries to be sharper/quicker/better than the people he is interviewing.

it is a war with him and he was attacking noel when he was in the fucking green room with no chance to defend himself!

noel was on the defense from the start and when he started to settle down and tell some funny storys ross got scared and knew that there was a danger of noel stealing his show so he got sheepish and cut to the song!

self important wanker that he is. another failed rock star.