|
|
Post by oa515 on Jul 2, 2004 9:59:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by webm@ster on Jul 2, 2004 10:36:52 GMT -5
'Grumpy' Oasis admit they were only at Glasto for the money, amid allegations that the Gallaghers had a row before what many claim was a highly disappointing headline show on Friday.
Undoutedly the biggest disappointment at Glastonbury was Oasis. Saying little to the crowd, looking even more miserable than usual and playing their hits in a trudging tiresome fashion left many fans heartbroken despite some quarters claiming it to be a 'triumphant' set.
VF bumped into Liam Gallagher backstage on Saturday and he said: "I fucking hate Glastonbury mate. I'm only here for the money. It's fucking shit. I've got to wear fucking wellies."
Then, in perhaps a veiled admission that the band could have done better, he said: "We were alright. It was OK. What else am I going to say? It's not going to change the world, is it?"
Explanations for the performance centred around an alleged row between the Gallaghers.
Kasabian singer Tom Meighan who had been hanging out with his idol, Liam, commented: "They had a row, they were both on it, big time." It quashes the myth that the Oasis camp had been a drug-free one.
Despite playing two new songs 'A Bell Will Ring' and 'The Meaning Of Soul', Noel Gallagher told the BBC that Oasis will have to think about a change of direction for the follow-up to Heathen Chemistry.
He said: "We've got to decide what kind of record we're going to do now, because the record that we tried to make with Death In Vegas, that kind of didn't happen and the moment has passed for that batch of songs. So it's back to the drawing board really. Hopefully, it will be out by the end of the year but I wouldn't have thought so."
Speaking on Sunday, festival organsier Michael Eavis said: "They didn't seem to want to be here. I was disappointed they never spoke to the crowd. They seemed grumpy to me - but maybe that's just their thing."
|
|
Contom
Madferrit Fan
Posts: 90
|
Post by Contom on Jul 2, 2004 13:29:30 GMT -5
lol how much would they off got paid?
|
|
|
|
Post by RicoRicardo on Jul 2, 2004 13:40:17 GMT -5
Doesn't Glastonbury money go to Charity?
|
|
|
|
Post by thebeerbaron1 on Jul 2, 2004 17:32:46 GMT -5
i know where liam is coming from here.
wellies! fucking never.
and i hate that hippy vagina with the ego problem that runs the show.
fuck it, i just hate fucking hippies!
peace and love makes shit rock n roll.
the day liam hugs a tree is the day that i walk away from my love of music.
|
|
|
|
Post by oa515 on Jul 2, 2004 18:55:31 GMT -5
lol how much would they off got paid? I read somewhere that the headline act at Glasto gets 200k. It was an article of how the Darkness were getting cocky. They demanded 500k to do it but were told in less polite terms to, go away |
|
|
|
Post by nyr401994 on Jul 3, 2004 11:00:35 GMT -5
baron, wasn't it the beatles who said all you need is love? lol
|
|
|
|
Post by thebeerbaron1 on Jul 3, 2004 16:26:21 GMT -5
all you need is love?
was'nt fire from the sky being dropped on nam at that time?
liam is working class, he came from nothing and he aint a bullshitter.
it was an ok gig. thats about it!
he loves music and can see whats wrong with it.
a lot!
look at jet and starsailor for fuck sake.
dont get me started on coldplay, snowpatrol etc..
|
|
|
|
Post by maketradefair on Jul 3, 2004 16:51:34 GMT -5
so are you saying you hate hendrix and the beatles. ? your talking crap man..
|
|
polsh
Madferrit Fan
avin' it
Posts: 94
|
Post by polsh on Jul 3, 2004 19:02:03 GMT -5
to be honest i was surprised when they sed they were gonna do glasto. when they did the festival couple of years ago, reading or leeds or summit, noel said they were doin that cos they didnt eva wanna do glasto again cos they ave all ready dun it and its full of hippies.....
I LOVE OASIS MAN!!!!!!!!!
|
|
ListenUp
Oasis Roadie
Mad Fer It
Posts: 240
|
Post by ListenUp on Jul 3, 2004 19:57:28 GMT -5
Oasis was the best part of Glastonbury 2004 period.  |
|
|
|
Post by maketradefair on Jul 4, 2004 8:09:34 GMT -5
no, kings of leon and paul mccartney were the best parts of it. and fraz ferdinand were excellent too. oasis were good, but not at their best.
|
|
|
|
Post by Familiar2u on Jul 4, 2004 10:56:07 GMT -5
not talking to the crowd....
That's not like Oasis, they must really hate the place.
|
|
|
|
Post by Columbia on Jul 4, 2004 12:20:33 GMT -5
no, kings of leon and paul mccartney were the best parts of it. and fraz ferdinand were excellent too. oasis were good, but not at their best. trust me kings of leon were shit, they looked scared to be playing to such a big crowd and they were to quiet, i was disapointed with their set. |
|
|
|
Post by thebeerbaron1 on Jul 4, 2004 16:54:57 GMT -5
paul mc'cartney is an asshole who uses the legacy of the beatles for his own money driven aims!
the guy is dirty. dont be fooled by something good that he did when he was in the greatest band of all time a long time ago.
he is a dirty fucker.
lennon/mc'cartney changes to mc'cartney/lennon.
let it be gets remixed, what next?
re-rite history according to paul?
fuck the dirty fucker!
true story. ringo comes over to pauls house after the knighthood.
hi paul. glad to hear about the knighthood.
its SIR PAUL to you!
he,he, paul.
its SIR PAUL ringo!
erm, ok paul.
ringo never came back again!
|
|
|
|
Post by JohnJa on Jul 5, 2004 4:26:20 GMT -5
beerbaron ------------------you talk COMPLETE sh*t im sorry but your *nob  dear god.* dear god. i dont think im even goin to argue with anything you've said above. you see, readers of the forum, this is how not to be. i mean lmao how old are you?? 10.  wtf lol just read what hes put!! its just beyond belief  |
|
|
|
Post by Tomo on Jul 5, 2004 13:02:35 GMT -5
Fuckin Hell!
If Macca thought his songs were any good he wouldve played Mull Of Kintyre instead of Get Back or sumthin.
|
|
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5